We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
... but we're going to have to do something about the population criteria. And I can't think of anything sensible. The only idea I've had so far is to declare the current duchies "permanent for now" and make dukes go through the Landsraad to appoint barons... but that's not really desirable. So, um, does anybody have any ideas?
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
- Andreas the Wise
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
- Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
That sounds reasonable. If you want, you could also redefine voting stuff in this act - something that comes to mind for me is giving Dukes more "votes" than Barons (so new citizens can also do something as Barons) - like a Duke's vote counts as 3, a Baron's vote as 1, and the Kaiser's as 5 or something.
- Harald of Froyalan
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:29 pm
- Location: Avaldsnes, Cimmeria.
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Declare the current Duchies permanent and if a Duke wants appoint a Baron (s)he must obtain the approval of the Kaiser.
Harald of Ettlingar Freyu
Count of Cimmeria
Count of Cimmeria
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I kinda like that last idea. But no votes for Barons. And leave the dukes at 1 vote. And just outright remove the duchy criteria... just strip the section down to bare bones... A lot of those old laws are just complex and useless now, and part of why I think previous attempts at restoration have failed..
My oppinion is that we must removed anything from the old days and laws that are in our way now. Return the really early days.. when Dukes votes only.. and things were simple...
My oppinion is that we must removed anything from the old days and laws that are in our way now. Return the really early days.. when Dukes votes only.. and things were simple...
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I agree with Harald and Erik. I believe all unnecessary complication will only hinder progress. We cannot waste time and energy when it comes to the revival of Great Shireroth! 
By His H47,
Baron Benkern of Vorpmadal, Yardistan.
"Like us or hate us, someone will still hold the torch. You might as well try to like us." - Harvey Steffke
"Tis not a leaving of a harried knave/Tis not with tail tucked in shame/Rather in glorious exhibition of benevolent might/Sun bids the world an emblazon g'night."
"But every beginning is only a continuation and the book of fate is always open in the middle."
Baron Benkern of Vorpmadal, Yardistan.
"Like us or hate us, someone will still hold the torch. You might as well try to like us." - Harvey Steffke
"Tis not a leaving of a harried knave/Tis not with tail tucked in shame/Rather in glorious exhibition of benevolent might/Sun bids the world an emblazon g'night."
"But every beginning is only a continuation and the book of fate is always open in the middle."
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I agree.
From a distance I'm concerned about the rampant lawyerism manifesting itself in Shireroth currently. A simple Kaiserial slap on the wrist or censure by the community should suffice. - Jacobus Loki
Can't you see? I'm crazy!

Can't you see? I'm crazy!
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Allright, allright! I'll draft something up later today... it's just that as far as I can see, we should a) *either* disallow dukes from appointing barons, *or* b) not give barons the right to vote in Landsraad....
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Or both for now...
Ari.. wanna be Steward? You are already with how incredibly much you've been doing...
Ari.. wanna be Steward? You are already with how incredibly much you've been doing...
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I'd rather not... it's just... I make a nice ad-hoc organiser and technical worker, I guess, but... no, really, I've got to turn this one down. I'm still too worried about the future for it. Maybe if we managed to recruit a few new nifty and stable-looking citizens first...
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
- Andreas the Wise
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
- Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Just don't give Barons power in the Landsraad ...Ari Rahikkala wrote:Allright, allright! I'll draft something up later today... it's just that as far as I can see, we should a) *either* disallow dukes from appointing barons, *or* b) not give barons the right to vote in Landsraad....
Or the power to comment, but not vote.
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Anyway, just as a reminder, I do still want to be the MiniEx. It's just the position of the Steward that I find... not right at the moment
.
Oh, and here's the bill as I see it:
0. This bill amends LawBook Chapters II and III.
1. Chapter II section C shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
C. Creation
1. Duchies
a. Duchies may be created from Shirithian land by the Kaiser at will.
b. Duchies may by created from Shirithian land by full consensus of the Landsraad.
2. Baronies
a. Baronies may be created from Shirithian land by the Kaiser at will, and placed under any Duchy.
b. Baronies may be created from Shirithian land by a simple majority of the Landsraad. They may be placed under any Duchy with the agreement of its Duke.
3. Promotion
a. The procedure for the promotion of a Barony to a Duchy shall follow the criteria and procedures for the creation of a new Duchy.
2. Chapter II section D shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
D. Destruction
1. Duchies
a. A Duchy may be dissolved by the Kaiser at will.
b. A Duchy may be dissolved by full consensus of the Landsraad.
2. Baronies
a. A Barony may be dissolved by the Kaiser at will.
b. A Barony may be dissolved by a simple majority of the Landsraad.
3. Chapter II section E shall be stricken.
4. Chapter III section A shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
A. Dukes
1. Powers granted
a. Any Duke has complete power to do whatever zie wishes within zir Duchy, within zir restrictions.
b. Any Duke may place restrictions upon Barons within zir Duchy.
c. All Dukes are members of the Landsraad, with the privileges and duties enumerated in the Procedures of the Landsraad.
2. Restrictions
a. No Duke may violate Imperial law.
b. No Duke may conduct significant foreign policy.
c. No Duke may call for the overthrow of the government.
d. No Duke may secede from Shireroth.
e. A Duke's powers affect only zir Duchy and those within.
f. No Duke may enter a military alliance with another Duke.
5. Chapter III section D shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
D. Appointing Barons
1. A Baron may be appointed to a Barony by the Kaiser or a simple majority of the Landsraad.
6. Chapter III section F shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
F. Removing Barons
1. A Baron may be removed by the Kaiser or a simple majority of the Landsraad.
Oh, and here's the bill as I see it:
0. This bill amends LawBook Chapters II and III.
1. Chapter II section C shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
C. Creation
1. Duchies
a. Duchies may be created from Shirithian land by the Kaiser at will.
b. Duchies may by created from Shirithian land by full consensus of the Landsraad.
2. Baronies
a. Baronies may be created from Shirithian land by the Kaiser at will, and placed under any Duchy.
b. Baronies may be created from Shirithian land by a simple majority of the Landsraad. They may be placed under any Duchy with the agreement of its Duke.
3. Promotion
a. The procedure for the promotion of a Barony to a Duchy shall follow the criteria and procedures for the creation of a new Duchy.
2. Chapter II section D shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
D. Destruction
1. Duchies
a. A Duchy may be dissolved by the Kaiser at will.
b. A Duchy may be dissolved by full consensus of the Landsraad.
2. Baronies
a. A Barony may be dissolved by the Kaiser at will.
b. A Barony may be dissolved by a simple majority of the Landsraad.
3. Chapter II section E shall be stricken.
4. Chapter III section A shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
A. Dukes
1. Powers granted
a. Any Duke has complete power to do whatever zie wishes within zir Duchy, within zir restrictions.
b. Any Duke may place restrictions upon Barons within zir Duchy.
c. All Dukes are members of the Landsraad, with the privileges and duties enumerated in the Procedures of the Landsraad.
2. Restrictions
a. No Duke may violate Imperial law.
b. No Duke may conduct significant foreign policy.
c. No Duke may call for the overthrow of the government.
d. No Duke may secede from Shireroth.
e. A Duke's powers affect only zir Duchy and those within.
f. No Duke may enter a military alliance with another Duke.
5. Chapter III section D shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
D. Appointing Barons
1. A Baron may be appointed to a Barony by the Kaiser or a simple majority of the Landsraad.
6. Chapter III section F shall be stricken and replaced with the following:
F. Removing Barons
1. A Baron may be removed by the Kaiser or a simple majority of the Landsraad.
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I'd like to ask you once more... with this bill, barons become small-time players with no voice in the Landsraad anyway - so why bother going through the Landsraad to appoint them? My plan is that unless there are no other problems with the form of this bill, I will present it to the Landsraad *without* parts 5 and 6, and if someone presents the bill in this form, I'm going to vote *against* it.
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
As long as Barons get no vote or power in the Landsraad I don't see why a Duke can't appoint Barons. As well as dismiss them and dissolve a barony.
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
- Andreas the Wise
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
- Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
As a Feudal system, it makes a lot more sense if Dukes appoint their own Barons, rather than the Landsraad.
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
It's also the traditional way of things...
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
- Harald of Froyalan
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 2:29 pm
- Location: Avaldsnes, Cimmeria.
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Indeed.Andreas the Wise wrote:As a Feudal system, it makes a lot more sense if Dukes appoint their own Barons, rather than the Landsraad.
Harald of Ettlingar Freyu
Count of Cimmeria
Count of Cimmeria
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
What if Dukes appoint Barons, with the Landsraad (and of course the Kaiser) having a veto?
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Or just take them out of the system... which the Bill in the LAndsraad seems to be doing..
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I want my Barons 
From a distance I'm concerned about the rampant lawyerism manifesting itself in Shireroth currently. A simple Kaiserial slap on the wrist or censure by the community should suffice. - Jacobus Loki
Can't you see? I'm crazy!

Can't you see? I'm crazy!
- Kaiser Mors V
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
I have plans for them.. so I want them too.. in the long run..
Recruit people.. then we can justify them..
Recruit people.. then we can justify them..
Mortis Mercator V,
Kaiser of Shireroth
Duke of Brookshire
Count of Monty Crisco
- Andreas the Wise
- Posts: 5253
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
- Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
- Contact:
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Including me *hint hint*Jonas wrote:I want my Barons
The character Andreas the Wise is on indefinite leave.
However, this account still manages:
Cla'Udi - Count of Melangia
Manuel - CEO of VBNC. For all you'll ever need.
Vincent Waldgrave - Lord General of Gralus
Q - Director of SAMIN
Duke Mel'Kat - Air Pirate, Melangian, and Duke of the Flying Duchy of Glanurchy
And references may be made to Vur'Alm Xei'Bôn (a Nelagan Micron of undisclosed purpose).
However, this account still manages:
Cla'Udi - Count of Melangia
Manuel - CEO of VBNC. For all you'll ever need.
Vincent Waldgrave - Lord General of Gralus
Q - Director of SAMIN
Duke Mel'Kat - Air Pirate, Melangian, and Duke of the Flying Duchy of Glanurchy
And references may be made to Vur'Alm Xei'Bôn (a Nelagan Micron of undisclosed purpose).
Re: We all love the Feudal Holdings Act
Andreas the Wise wrote:
Including me *hint hint*
From a distance I'm concerned about the rampant lawyerism manifesting itself in Shireroth currently. A simple Kaiserial slap on the wrist or censure by the community should suffice. - Jacobus Loki
Can't you see? I'm crazy!

Can't you see? I'm crazy!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests