WHAT?!?! CIVILIZATION?!?!?!?!?!
- Braden Indianensis
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:06 pm
- Location: Number 12 Concord Street, Nafticon, Republic of Antica
WHAT?!?! CIVILIZATION?!?!?!?!?!
I always find it interesting to look at peoples' ideas about their own civilization. Example, here in America. I cannot tell you how often I hear people refer to the ancient Romans (and even the ancient Greeks, if you can believe it) as savages. Savages! People in this country think they're very advanced. But we're not really. We have electricity and gunpowder weapons. We have gadgets, like iPods, and TVs, and computers, but really, we are not anymore civilized than the peoples of antiquity. In fact, looking at 80% of the people with whom I attend school, as well as most of the people I see on television or simply walking down the street, I would say we're actually less civilized than the ancient Greeks and Romans, the Babylonians, the Egyptians, the Persians. Thoughts?
Antican Ambassador to Shireroth and Babkha
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
- AngelGuardian93
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 8:36 pm
- Location: Russell Castle, Mirioth
Agreed. We have this odd way of thinking that civilization is advanced through techonology, but that is only a symptom, not the cause. This place would descend to the level other places are commonly at if we lost our techology...
There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.
- Scott of Hyperborea
- Posts: 2816
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:17 pm
- Location: Ireland
"Civilized" is a hard word to define. But going by a fuzzy, "what I think it means" type of discussion, I would say we are more civilized than the Romans, at least. The Romans kept slaves, enjoyed bloodsports, and were quite happy with invading indiscriminately and massacring anyone who seemed likely to resist. We've got civil rights, don't have anything much more violent than wrestling, and make up long chains of convoluted logic when we invade somewhere.
As for Greece, I would say it's a tie.
As for Greece, I would say it's a tie.
- Braden Indianensis
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:06 pm
- Location: Number 12 Concord Street, Nafticon, Republic of Antica
OK, it was sort of foolish to say we were more civilized than the Romans
. However, just looking at average, everyday people in America, would you say that they were more or less civilized than average, everyday people in ancient Greece (considering what is known about the day-to-day lives of people at that time and taking into account the fact that civilization is an uncertain concept and different for everybody)?
Antican Ambassador to Shireroth and Babkha
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
It's difficult to define "civilised" when certain aspects of our society have degraded to points far surpassing barbarity, whereas others have exceeded social conscienciousness.
We have people who kidnap and sell children on the black market today. But we have our civil rights. We have people who are so poor that they're selling their organs to hospitals just to get some cash. But we have social security.
You see what I mean?
We have people who kidnap and sell children on the black market today. But we have our civil rights. We have people who are so poor that they're selling their organs to hospitals just to get some cash. But we have social security.
You see what I mean?
Oh ye who torments me in dreams of dark abysses, beware the sleeping shadow, for it is a bane like no other...
-The Sorcerer of Korgun-Amoth
-The Sorcerer of Korgun-Amoth
- Hypatia Agnesi
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:06 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
-
osmose1000
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:35 pm
- Location: My Airship
- Contact:
-
21st Century Stjepan
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:34 pm
-
Kaiser Letifer II
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 12:53 pm
- Braden Indianensis
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:06 pm
- Location: Number 12 Concord Street, Nafticon, Republic of Antica
Survivor v. the gladiatorial spectacles.Hypatia Agnesi wrote:We no longer have colosseums, but we have reality TV.
Somehow I'd rather see real blood congealing on the sands of the coliseum floor than ketchup drying in the backlot of CBS Studios.
Antican Ambassador to Shireroth and Babkha
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
Former Speaker of the Assembly of the Republic of Antica
Reporter for the Antican Liberator
Elder Guard of the Order of the Vorpal Blade
- Hypatia Agnesi
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:06 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Well, Surviror is actually filmed on location, and it's often interesting (though I only watched maybe 3 seasons, when it was new). Big Brother, on the other hand, is indeed filmed on a backlot.
I think the first major lesson the producers of Survivor learned, though, was that lethargic, starving survivors make for bad TV. They put Surivior: Africa on a fucking GAME PRESERVE on the dry savannah somewhere, with no edible plants whatsoever. The poor contestants couldn't hunt anything, and they had some bits of cornmeal or rice (that were provided) as their only food source (which is enough to barely get by, but not enough to give you enough energy to generate drama). They also gave one tribe a wet mud hole (which I believe had animal feces in it much of the time) as their only water source. Sure, they'd be boiling it, but that is just unnecessarily gross.
Oddly, Survivor: Australia was also in a nature preserve, but they at least had some nearby edible plants and fish from the nearby river to live off of. That one had much more drama and energy than the African one.
Lesson learned by CBS: you can make the contestants suffer, but they need to remain energetic in order to make for good TV.
I think the first major lesson the producers of Survivor learned, though, was that lethargic, starving survivors make for bad TV. They put Surivior: Africa on a fucking GAME PRESERVE on the dry savannah somewhere, with no edible plants whatsoever. The poor contestants couldn't hunt anything, and they had some bits of cornmeal or rice (that were provided) as their only food source (which is enough to barely get by, but not enough to give you enough energy to generate drama). They also gave one tribe a wet mud hole (which I believe had animal feces in it much of the time) as their only water source. Sure, they'd be boiling it, but that is just unnecessarily gross.
Oddly, Survivor: Australia was also in a nature preserve, but they at least had some nearby edible plants and fish from the nearby river to live off of. That one had much more drama and energy than the African one.
Lesson learned by CBS: you can make the contestants suffer, but they need to remain energetic in order to make for good TV.
National Picketer
Hypatia's Mom's Daughter
M.I.A.
Hypatia's Mom's Daughter
M.I.A.
-
21st Century Stjepan
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:34 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest