But again, this is just a preliminary hearing. Partly to give me something to do as well.
So, the word is free as we say.
Moderator: CJ Miller
(Loki appears in a cloud of smoke)Don't, don't, DON'T say that. Why don't you just say it clear as day: "Jake, please make trouble!"
But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.Bacchus wrote: to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong
WHAT?Leo wrote:But if it is a law suit you are looking for then I should inform you that I have been considering weather or not to take legal action against the Duke of Elwynn for monetary compensation for the neglect of his duchy under the pretenses of: kidnapping or possession.
Now now lets not get ahead of ourselves here, assuming you have won before you start is first off quite pretentious of you and secondly not prudent on your behalf.Allot wrote:PREPARE FOR THE SMACKDOWN, STEWARD
In law, this basic premise I wholeheartedly agree with, but it's a different story in micronational or more specifically Shirerithian law. Observe this statute:Leo wrote:But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.
I conclude from this that it doesn't matter whether someone takes offence at an act or whatever, but the Judex and/or the Kaiser can consider that when they are deciding whether something is malicious or not. Make sense?LB I.C wrote:1. Should anyone break a law, but do so either as part of a non-malicious act or for reasons that are obviously good ones and beneficial to the nation, they will not be considered guilty and will not be subject to the normal punishment.
2. Whether a certain incident was part of a non-malicious act or beneficial to the nation will be under the discretion of whatever judiciary bodies exist at the time the incident took place, as well as the Kaiser.
I thought that was the list, dear Jacobus.Jacobus Loki wrote:(Appropriates large chair)
Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?
Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest