No seriously a law revision request

For commoners to suggest and discuss Landsraad bills

Moderators: Jonas, CJ Miller

User avatar
Aurangzeb Khan
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: The Citadel, Ardashirshahr

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Aurangzeb Khan »

Do you kill people in games for fun?

Naturally yes.
And by that same logic does that make you a murderer in the real world?

While there is a time and a season for everything - in this instance no, the motive and the opportunity remain poles apart...
In this instance, I believe the legality of "ravishing" was in a satirical and absurd sense. Thus, we are merely stacking on to the absurdity by making this gender-inclusive. Honestly, I kinda laughed when the idea was first brought up. Now you're detracting from my fun and its silliness by having a meaningful and angered discussion about this? What the hell people! And I thought the Babkhans would be the ones laughing at this with me! :knife
I did think we were laughing at this - it is quite funny that we would introduce measures to ensure gender equality with regards to what is essentially state sanctioned barbarism. I'd even thought up the bureaucratic mechanism that would monitor the changed law - Ravishment and Molestation Balancing Organisation: RAMBO for short. But in any event I regarded the original statute as a quaint barbarous anachronism that ought to be preserved on its own merits.

Anyway I'd much rather have my fictional self murdered by outraged Amazons, indeed it would be a good story in its own right, rather than anyone do anything so silly as resign over this.
User avatar
hypatias mom
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:42 am
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by hypatias mom »

Ardashir--

The problem is not the give-and-take discussions here on the Shireroth forum. Those are not the issue. The concerns arrise when the issue becomes fodder for the micronational universe, and a person, rather than a fictional identity is maligned. Not being able to tell truth from fantasy, some might believe what is printed about the character of the real person. This is tabloid journalism, not true reporting.

The idea that a Shirithian would encourage this type of article by someone who doesn't understand the nature of Shireroth, has already led to hurt feelkings, and could easily become injurious to someone's real life reputation. I do not see this as silly, as you apparently do.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

I always thought Shireroth's sense of humour was terrible. I thought it was obvious and lacked subtance. But after reading this I have to apologize, because this thread is fucking hilarious.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

The beauty of Shireroth (all praise the Founder and his popcorn) is that it is an amazingly "big tent". Under the boughs of Malarbor nestle gentle pixie beings on one side, and, well, Ardashir. And the Tree shades them both.

As well he should. The irreconcilable opposites synthesized into one.
I'm going to stop now before I get overly philosophical.

I've got to arrange to ship some kielbasa. :)
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

I think your avatar needs a fez instead of a tricorn.
User avatar
Aurangzeb Khan
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: The Citadel, Ardashirshahr

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Aurangzeb Khan »

Carol,

I understand your point but I think there is another side to this - everyone's identity in this hobby is to a greater or lesser extent a narrative construct, certainly our perspectives inform our actions and our emotions seep through onto the page from time to time, but we are ultimately operating in an 'unreal' fictive context. As long as no one outside the hobby is going to accost Pandora, or Will and Hesam for that matter, and berate them for stances they have taken or commentary they have provided, really, things are relatively fine. We can afford to be a bit more detached as our disputes and controversies are, ultimately, transient.
User avatar
Aurangzeb Khan
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: The Citadel, Ardashirshahr

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Aurangzeb Khan »

Hesam, get on MSN... unless of course you're busy working out how to rescue Georgia from "the shit".
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

I think your avatar needs a fez instead of a tricorn.
(raises tricorn, small smile, bows) :)
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

Sorry old boy, I must have missed you. As for Georgia, it was summarily put in it's place by those Oily Gazprom Cossacks.

"You are a very very naughty former dependency, now don't do it again"
User avatar
hypatias mom
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:42 am
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by hypatias mom »

Ardashir--

I happen to agree with your perspective about our fictional identities. It is hard sometimes for a newcomer to be detached, however, when the venue is suddenly changed and the rules are all different. I enjoy the fictitious characters and the roleplay here in Shireroth, though I am not accomplished at it by any means. I am also not being scrutinized outside of Shireroth without being prepared for it. All of us have seen how, when someone who is not experienced in micronations arrives, there is usually a learning curve, and the shock of "being in the spotlight" can be overwhelming, especially when that spotlight is not in one's normal, accustomed environment. The situation, as Pandora perceives it, is that she was accosted outside of Shireroth. She does not know about other micronations and their perspectives, and this article came out of the blue, so to speak. Her perspective is, I believe, valid for her, and it was upsetting to find herself in the middle of a situation she was unprepared for. The Shireroth forum is home ground, and a friendly environment. The INS is not.

Hesam--

I am thrilled we are able to provide you with such riveting entertainment. However, there is a real person who has received what is to her a great personal injury and, say what we might, levity is not appropriate here.
Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Erik Mortis »

Levity is all we have.. and our greatest tool.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Maybe we need a disclaimer, in small print, posted oscurely.
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

Or free speech, you know whichever.
Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Erik Mortis »

You speak of giving rights?
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

Not in Shireroth. Because rights can never be given, they must be taken.
Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Erik Mortis »

Good man.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

no, that we are not responisible for any semblance of reality or for any foreign preconceptions
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Jess
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: A flying Airbus A380 above Micras
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jess »

Jacobus, is right.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Jacobus, is right.
Yeah, but "Right" and 2 erb will get me a cheap breakfast.
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Jess
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: A flying Airbus A380 above Micras
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jess »

maybe I should open a resteraunt called McJacobus'
User avatar
hypatias mom
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:42 am
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by hypatias mom »

Don't forget the cheap coffee and stale donuts.
Jess
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: A flying Airbus A380 above Micras
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jess »

Stale Mango Doughnut, anyone?
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Mmmmmmm, Mango Donuts, they are great!

(I'm Jacobus, and I approve this message).
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
User avatar
Aurangzeb Khan
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: The Citadel, Ardashirshahr

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Aurangzeb Khan »

I think I will establish an alternative venue. Khanbucks; overpriced frothy milk with the vague hint of coffee... AND IF YOU DON'T ORDER A PASTRY TO GO WITH THAT YOU WILL BE TAKEN OUTSIDE AND SHOT!
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

An overpriced dry pastry? Yum!
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

Is Khanbucks stock going for a ridiculously low price due to market saturation, an ageing brand and rampant mismanagement?
User avatar
Aurangzeb Khan
Posts: 3251
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: The Citadel, Ardashirshahr

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Aurangzeb Khan »

No, Zurvan be praised, we have put the infidel imitators Costa Coffee, Coffee Republic and Café Nero et al to the sword, literally. The masses shall have no choice but to savour the ubiquitous blandness of our offerings and pay over the odds accordingly.
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

Fare enough. MSN?
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Here's 2 erb for overly-frothy coffee and a stale bagel with processed dehydrated cream cheese food.
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
User avatar
hypatias mom
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:42 am
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: No seriously a law revision request

Post by hypatias mom »

Yum!! :p
Post Reply

Return to “Landsraad Front Gate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest