Difference between revisions of "Shirerithian Neofeudalism"

From ShireWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a term used to describe the phenomena of oligarchic rule that emerged in the Imperial Republic following the Auspicious Occasion of 1651, effectively...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a term used to describe the phenomena of oligarchic rule that emerged in the Imperial Republic following the [[Auspicious Occasion]] of 1651, effectively replacing the fractious federative system of governance, where constitutional checks and balances were maintained by the entrenchment of the rights of [[Imperial States|states]], with a new synthesis of familial, corporate and military power directed by numerous diffuse boards of control centrally coordinated by the [[Imperial Advisory Council]], whose powers were further entrenched at the expense of those formerly held by the Kaiser, following the revision and reissue of the [[Charter]] in 1653.
+
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is a term used to describe the phenomena of collectivist-oligarchic rule that emerged in the Imperial Republic following the [[Auspicious Occasion]] of 1651, effectively replacing the fractious federative system of governance, where constitutional checks and balances were maintained by the entrenchment of the rights of [[Imperial States|states]], with a new synthesis of familial, corporate and military power directed by numerous diffuse boards of control centrally coordinated by the [[Imperial Advisory Council]], whose powers were further entrenched at the expense of those formerly held by the Kaiser, following the revision and reissue of the [[Charter]] in 1653.
 +
 
 +
As neofeudalism became more entrenched during the administration of Burgrave [[Waldemar Zinkgraven]] the key ministries of state were handed to corporations to hold "in-commission". These corporations were in turn primarily owned by the surviving members of the ancient noble houses and the more recently ennobled minor gentry, the so-called untitled lords, to whom the privileges of citizenship, the prospect of a seat on the [[Landsraad]] for instance, accrued. This process made citizens stakeholders in the state but also held out to denizens the prospect of advancement through service as technocrats in the institutions of state and the corporate bodies.
 +
 
 +
The fate of the denizen is also instructive of the nature of the neofeudal society. Although elevation through service was an avenue of advancement for the able, those who, for whatever reason, were unable to sustain themselves through their own endeavour could voluntarily subordinate themselves by a declaration of submission whereby the denizen would become '''His Majesty's Loyal Subject''' and receive guaranteed protection and employment, whether from the state directly or through a noble house or corporation at the cost of surrendering theoretical liberty. Such a submission was by no means dishonourable, indeed all recruits to the ranks of the [[Imperial Forces]] by their nature became His Majesty's Loyal Subjects and gain status subsequently through promotion through the ranks.
 +
 
 +
By contrast [[Community Service Workers]] did indeed endure the conditions commonly associated with [[Old Feudalism]].
  
 
[[Category:Government]][[Category:Ideology]]
 
[[Category:Government]][[Category:Ideology]]

Revision as of 09:53, 21 December 2017

Shirerithian Neofeudalism is a term used to describe the phenomena of collectivist-oligarchic rule that emerged in the Imperial Republic following the Auspicious Occasion of 1651, effectively replacing the fractious federative system of governance, where constitutional checks and balances were maintained by the entrenchment of the rights of states, with a new synthesis of familial, corporate and military power directed by numerous diffuse boards of control centrally coordinated by the Imperial Advisory Council, whose powers were further entrenched at the expense of those formerly held by the Kaiser, following the revision and reissue of the Charter in 1653.

As neofeudalism became more entrenched during the administration of Burgrave Waldemar Zinkgraven the key ministries of state were handed to corporations to hold "in-commission". These corporations were in turn primarily owned by the surviving members of the ancient noble houses and the more recently ennobled minor gentry, the so-called untitled lords, to whom the privileges of citizenship, the prospect of a seat on the Landsraad for instance, accrued. This process made citizens stakeholders in the state but also held out to denizens the prospect of advancement through service as technocrats in the institutions of state and the corporate bodies.

The fate of the denizen is also instructive of the nature of the neofeudal society. Although elevation through service was an avenue of advancement for the able, those who, for whatever reason, were unable to sustain themselves through their own endeavour could voluntarily subordinate themselves by a declaration of submission whereby the denizen would become His Majesty's Loyal Subject and receive guaranteed protection and employment, whether from the state directly or through a noble house or corporation at the cost of surrendering theoretical liberty. Such a submission was by no means dishonourable, indeed all recruits to the ranks of the Imperial Forces by their nature became His Majesty's Loyal Subjects and gain status subsequently through promotion through the ranks.

By contrast Community Service Workers did indeed endure the conditions commonly associated with Old Feudalism.