Yastrebian Autocracy: Difference between revisions

From ShireWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Goldshire]] functions as a '''Yastrebian Autocracy''', named for the Yastrebs of Goldshire whose governing style was used as a model. A Yastrebian Autocracy can be described as a small oligarchy of Counts whose ranks are selected by an autocratic King whose right to wield power is at the discretion of those Counts. This balance of power can become very volatile should one or more of the Counts chose to work against the King (it a factor that led to at least one civil war), thus encouraging both parties to pursue good communication and walk a path of moderacy and compromise.
[[Goldshire]] functions as a '''Yastrebian Autocracy''', named for the Yastrebs of Goldshire whose governing style was used as a model. A Yastrebian Autocracy can be described as a small oligarchy of Counts whose ranks are selected by an autocratic King whose right to wield power is at the discretion of those Counts. This balance of power can become very volatile should one or more of the Counts chose to work against the King (it was a factor that led to at least one civil war), thus encouraging both parties to pursue good communication and walk a path of moderacy and compromise.

Revision as of 06:43, 16 August 2017

Goldshire functions as a Yastrebian Autocracy, named for the Yastrebs of Goldshire whose governing style was used as a model. A Yastrebian Autocracy can be described as a small oligarchy of Counts whose ranks are selected by an autocratic King whose right to wield power is at the discretion of those Counts. This balance of power can become very volatile should one or more of the Counts chose to work against the King (it was a factor that led to at least one civil war), thus encouraging both parties to pursue good communication and walk a path of moderacy and compromise.