Page 1 of 2
On Mar Sara
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:47 pm
by b3n|<3r|\|
Erik is right, Mar Sara is land that has been fought over and so on. I concede not a lot is going on there now, but it is populated (if only by me), it has a Count, it has a long and interesting history. Of all the Counties to give half away to another country, why that one? I'm not asking that we expand to get the North (though I'd quite like that), but I do ask we don't let anyone else have it if we can stop 'em.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 12:57 pm
by Erik Mortis
And we CAN stop them. We claimed that land years ago. I think we fought a Hubert War over it. Long have we sought for the northern portion of it, rightfully ours. Why would we give away the southern part now?
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:02 pm
by Andreas the Wise
Er, guys ... before you get all historical ... they're talking about the Northern Half. Ie the one we haven't claimed.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:31 pm
by Erik Mortis
Yes. umm... okey.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:17 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
I pushed for Maraguo / Batavia to get it. I'd accept that or Shireroth.
The "no more pixels for Shireroth MCS ruling" should be used to our advantage. If we give up one pixel, for whatever good reason, we should get one somewhere else.
There is always part of this:
http://www.shireroth.org/shirewiki/Image:New_new.png
Lots of green islands & such.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 5:41 am
by Ari Rahikkala
Unless someone comes up with a better idea, I'll take the above to the Landsraad tomorrow. Checking quickly, I don't think it's a pixel-by-pixel swap, but it does come close to not changing our land area sum.
Er, guys ... before you get all historical ... they're talking about the Northern Half. Ie the one we haven't claimed.
Sorry, no choice but to get historical here! You see, we actually held the north half of the isle before we ever held the south part. Check the map archives if you doubt this.
According to Bill we got it as part of a deal he had with Erik, in exchange for our support for Tapfer's secession from Tymaria. We got the south part years later with the collapse of Menelmacar. The north part was lost (again years later) to the Atkins reduction.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 12:41 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
Go 'fer it.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 2:24 pm
by Andreas the Wise
I'll take it that's based off the empire map? Not worth putting it as two counties, north and south?
No?
Well, I'm done, go ahead ....
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:58 pm
by Andreas the Wise
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:04 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
Antican spies?
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:15 pm
by Malliki
WAR!!
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:22 pm
by Andreas the Wise
Diplomatic discussions?
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 4:28 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
No war. Not. Yet.
See PM.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:01 pm
by Andreas the Wise
Guess we shall have to claim elsewhere then. Jonas, I agree that getting Apollo City and that base Audentior province would be good. If we extended our claim a little further, we could even pick up the 100 lead we disparately need for trading purposes but that no one will trade to us, since Babkha are too concerned about their internal economy at the moment ....
EDIT: The following is clearly very rough and we wouldn't be allowed to claim the whole set. But it shows the original Apollo borders, plus the small extension needed to get us Lead. On the other side is the original I was working off (archive 3.5)

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:49 am
by Ari Rahikkala
If the MCS gives the territory to Antica, let them have it and let's not contest it.
Andreas, I don't think we can make a well-shaped claim to pick up that lead. Too few pixels to work with. It'd have to be an exclave or a silly-looking thin strip of land. (though I guess it depends on how you count which resources go where)
Here's a claim I'd support in the Landsraad, in exchange for the Middle Absentia niftification:

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:13 am
by Andreas the Wise
True, we have no real hope of getting it (resources are counted if your land covers half or more of them, so yeah, apart from a weird enclave, no hope).
I think that's a good claim, Ari. It's not the whole thing, but we have no real hope of getting the whole thing. It's shaped nicely and has the two major cities.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:24 am
by Jonas
Ari Rahikkala wrote:
Here's a claim I'd support in the Landsraad, in exchange for the Middle Absentia niftification:

Ari...
I love it! And if I remember right the world map in the Kildarian game (based on the map from CoD I) even show these cities! I could make them accesible if we get the land.

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:36 am
by Kaiser Loki III
I like this better than the other ideas I've seen.
OK.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:47 am
by b3n|<3r|\|
Could we at least send a diplomatic note to Antica asking them nicely not to claim northern Mar Sara before we consign its fate to be sat on for all eternity by Antica?
Also I love the fact that in the thread I posted specifically to ensure we made efforts to stop claims like these, it has beend decided that such a claim is fine.

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:15 am
by Ari Rahikkala
Well... as far as I am concerned, yes, yes we could. But fact is, if it came to a multiple-choice vote in the Landsraad, I would... be conflicted but vote for the Apollo City claim. We can always annex Antica again after all.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:20 am
by b3n|<3r|\|
Good point well made. I still think we should ask them though.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:38 am
by Kaiser Loki III
A Kaiser's work is never done......
I have expressed our reservation and concern, and have dispatched a communication to the antican representative.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:16 am
by Nick Foghorn Leghorn
As a dualcit with Antica, I can confidently state that the Anticans consider the land both pretty and nifty, and have no intention of dropping the claim. I think...
And getting Apollo back is preferable. There's some history there, where that Mar Sara claim would basically be manifest destiny at work.
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:19 am
by Jonas
Indeed. Apollo needs to be min... ours!

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:49 am
by Kaiser Loki III
Nick!
Good to see you again!
How go the battles?
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:29 pm
by Nick Foghorn Leghorn
Kaiser Loki III wrote:Nick!
Good to see you again!
How go the battles?
I've been around, I just haven't been posting much. Being president of 2 clubs, founding a new one, and with my course load, it's a miracle I even found this site again...
Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 2:41 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
Come around when you can. You are missed.

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:21 am
by Jonas
Grmbl. How long does it take to approve this claim in the MCS.

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:07 pm
by Maksym Hadjimehmetov
Actually, were we to reclaim all of Mar Sara I could lift a lot of Matbaa's work on the province which occupied the Northern Half (Suryo) into ShireWiki, as per my intellectual ownership and authorship of the majority of it.
With His Niftiness' permission, I'd like it if we could make Suryo its own County, perhaps as a subdivision of K'Tzuni so I can develop it myself? Or at least let me keep Sulayil as a city on the island, to relive old times...

Re: On Mar Sara
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:14 pm
by Kaiser Loki III
It's moot. The MCS gave it to Antica.
