Shireroth

Personally, I prefer Loki II. A bit of War of the Roses. But I do not with to anger the gods or the vox populi.

I could be Loki the Innumerable.

Suggestions? We have a coronation to prepare!

Loki III, to aknowledge that Ayreon was in fact Kaiser. Calling yourself Loki II could be interpreted as you not recognizing his reign.

How about Loki e, not quite III, but still after II.

Well Loki II would be like "up yours, Hasan" so yes...Loki II is acceptable.

But it would also be "Up yours, Ric", which I would outright refuse to allow.

Loki III. Makes our history saner.

Aw, come on Ari, you had the numerics 0 and i. Surely you'd support e.

Oroigawa Koreyasu wrote:But it would also be "Up yours, Ric", which I would outright refuse to allow.

Well Loki should have been the rightful kaiser but...

Indeed, that's why I'd like to keep e for myself

Certainly the Feigenbaum constant, uld fill in there. It would be more suiting for you, no?

If not en 6168

How about Loki îî? †∑ø?

Loki the Slightly more numerated than Loki II?

Lokiii?

HA! There ya go, Jess! What an awesome suggestion! I support that!

Well, I'll acknowledge Ric in retrospect. Never had a problem with him, still don't. I'm itching to throw around a decree or two, er, get on with the important business and all that.

Loki 2.1?

Harumph. After wandering the wiki, the consensus seems to be III. Can the Powers change this account to that, or should I register a new one?

Long live Kaiser Loki III!

I can change your username if you like, but again for making history and historical references on the forum saner, I'd prefer you register a new account...

Done!

All Hail Loki III.

http://www.shireroth.org/shirewiki/List ... _Third_Era

wait!
There was already Loki III as "anti-Kaiser" so.. wouldn't this be Loki IV?

Jonas put that there, just remove it because technically Anti-Kaisers don't count...

Why not? We have some other not completely legit Kaisers up. and he did try to rule, and some did listen to him. it add colour to our history.