Page 1 of 1
Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:17 pm
by Erik Mortis
The multi-temple is for religions. but what of more or less non religious conversation? Or should we just have the multi-templ double as that. The OT is more for trivial stuff really. And a good debate seems more sophisticated than that. Further the multi-temple is meant for organized religious stuff.
Re: Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:03 am
by b3n|<3r|\|
Multi-temple double! Unless it's trivial as you say in which case the Shrine of Controversy works well.
Re: Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 12:17 am
by Andreas the Wise
Or we could just give Yvain his own board ...
Re: Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:29 am
by Yvain Wintersong
Andreas once again earns his appellation!
Re: Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:36 pm
by Yvain Wintersong
So, who do I have to defeat in a duel to get this implemented?
Re: Do we need a forum for philosphy?
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:44 pm
by Krasniy Yastreb
Yvain Wintersong wrote:So, who do I have to defeat in a duel to get this implemented?
Malarbor himself. I hope your chainsaw's well-oiled...
