Page 1 of 2
To The Honorable Praetor of the Landsraad
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:50 pm
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
With your kind permission, I should like to edit the Imperial Charter.
Nicodemus
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:52 pm
by hypatias mom
Let's see if you keep your purloined crown and throne, and your head, first.
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:17 pm
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
"Purloined"! That's a naughty word. I prefer "absconded."
But, do you know what's really wierd? This is the day Mary I. ousted Jane Grey from the throne of England (I only realized this a few minutes ago, whilst I was reading the main page of Wikipedia)...this is an unplanned coincidence, though, and I sincerely hope my reign doesn't turn out to be like Mary's...
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:51 pm
by Gman Russell
*sets fire to your robes*
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:43 am
by andelarion
Actually, we don't have a praetor :P
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:23 am
by Gman Russell
Because I set fire to the Preator. Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Tell me, why do you want to edit the charter?
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:16 am
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
Since we do not have a Praetor, according to the Charter, the Landsraad must elect one immediately. Also, since their is no Praetor, I, as Kaiser, must serve. I, therefore, grant myself permission to edit the Charter. As for why--trust me, you'll like it.

To the Hononorable Praetor of the Landsraad
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:57 am
by hypatias mom
This is most irregular.
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:06 am
by Eriana Moon
Indeed but that's not always bad around here. At least it's activity... lol
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:33 am
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
We'll know in good time.

Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:13 pm
by Gman Russell
We? Mouse in the pocket?
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 4:33 pm
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
Two things:
1.) I was referring to the fact that we, as in, all of us, will know whether or not this is positive activity.
2.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralis_majestatis
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:37 pm
by Gman Russell
"We are NOT amused!"
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:25 am
by WolvinX84
What's the praetor do?
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:08 am
by Conglacio
The run the Landsraad. they are the speaker.
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:51 am
by Gman Russell
Destroy the Landsraad.
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:46 am
by Kaiser Nicodemus I
Destroy yourselves? Ah, nihilism...
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:43 pm
by WolvinX84
Ni?
But what exactly would one do as Praetor type?
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:23 pm
by osmose1000
Close a vote once it has commence, tally the votes, cast a tiebreaker, move finished votes to the proper forum, and add passed laws to the Lawbook.
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:57 pm
by WolvinX84
That doesn't seem that hard.
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:07 pm
by Kaiser Meskan II
The Praetor hasn't been fired, so he's still Praetor.
And no, you may not edit the charter.

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:09 pm
by WolvinX84
Where is this Charter? I don't see it. Maybe I'm just blind.
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:28 pm
by Kaiser Meskan II
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:36 pm
by WolvinX84
How do you make the funny ae symbol. Wait. To the char map!
æ.
That's a weird symbol.
So, after reading the Charter. It would appear that this antikaiser really wasn't legit. Yay! I'm learning!
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:51 pm
by hypatias mom
Jon--
Just because the Kaiser was on a leave of absence, it is not permissible to grab the throne. The Kaiser will leave when he is good and ready, and not until.
Hypatia's mom
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:26 am
by WolvinX84
I figured that much. But now I know the law behind it.
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:43 am
by Gman Russell
I love Nihilism. No, wait, I don't.
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:14 am
by osmose1000
Even if it isn't legal it's still a fun way to pass the time and a great way to get Bill to realize that we need him here. :P
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 8:57 am
by hypatias mom
I think this may have been the one way to force Bill back into realizing this nation (and we) need him to be a big part of Shireroth.
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 4:24 pm
by WolvinX84
Should not a nation not be dependent on one person?
I think I had to many 'not's in there.