B0O0/\/\ist Temple
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 7:34 pm
Tradition aside, shouldn't it be the Cedrist Temple?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:50 pm
Probably, but even then, it's kind of unoriginal. At least Soloralism had "Temple of the Quintessences" instead of "Soloralist Temple".
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:27 pm
But... if we change the name, we can't use the leet-y speak anymore! 
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:40 pm
You speak as though that would be a bad thing.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:04 pm
Hush you. :P
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:37 pm
We could call this...
'Cedric's Temple'
'Cedric's Temple'
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:40 pm
Uh........ NO.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:40 pm
Uh........ NO.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:56 pm
Hooray for double posts?
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:54 am
Go away bill....
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:09 pm
wtf?
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:55 am
"Probably, but even then, it's kind of unoriginal. At least Soloralism had "Temple of the Quintessences" instead of "Soloralist Temple"."
so I tell him to go away... all he EVER does in this forum is make snide comments and critisisms... never anything constructive... just pushes his Solarliamsimsmsm... and try to berate us.. so.. I tell him.. go away...
so I tell him to go away... all he EVER does in this forum is make snide comments and critisisms... never anything constructive... just pushes his Solarliamsimsmsm... and try to berate us.. so.. I tell him.. go away...
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:46 pm
Well, sure?
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:54 pm
Besides, Cedrism is the diversionary sect, not Boomism.