Page 1 of 1
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:35 pm
by osmose1000
Requiring long entries isn't such a good policy. Some topics are worth posting and yet will have small descriptions, like the Avatar From Hell entry... well, bad example, since *I* made that one, but still.Instead, I say we change it to a "You dumbarses have common sense, use it!" policy to encourage people to make their articles worth the time taken to create them in the first place. They call it a signature, but no one ever signs their posts...
Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:37 pm
by Fax Celestis
Purpose: To maintain the credibility and usefulness of the ShireWiki.Bill:1. Only registered members of the ShireWiki will be able to edit articles. Obtaining a registration shall remain simple and accessible to all. Registration prevents advertisers from posting and allows for tracking edits.2. Articles must be more than 500b upon posting. This is to ensure that the ShireWiki's content is rich and fulfilling, like a steak, instead of being sugary and worthless, like a twinkie.3. This act excludes redirects, image pages, and pages that only state something's identity to or relationship with something else, provided those pages link to the parent topic. Blindness Is A BlessingEdited by: Fax Celestis at: 8/22/05 11:03
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:54 pm
by Fax Celestis
The following articles are short, but still meet the length requirement.
http://www.shireroth.org/wiki/in...ized ... evengeNote how the length requirement isn't really all that much. Blindness Is A Blessing
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:47 pm
by Kaiser Los III
I strongly approve of this for a few reasons.1. A lot of the wiki articles show a complete lack of effort. Surely there is more to say about Brrapa Lu Eraro, Shirekeep, Cedrism, and the the Ministry of the Exterior than what is there.2. This will prevent people from filling up the site with too many frivolous articles, or at least make them put some more work into them.3. This will prevent someone from making a page for something important without making more than a sentence of information on it, then waiting for someone else to edit it so that it is actually useful. When this happens the person who write the real article doesn't get the credit. It's contumelious to expect other people to do your work for you.However, I would support a few alterations to this act to exclude redirects, image pages, and pages that only state something's identity to or relationship with something else (such as the pages for Fax's pseudonyms saying they're Fax's pseudonyms and then linking to the main Fax page). Edited by: Kaiser Los III at: 8/17/05 20:47
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 6:25 am
by Gryphon the Pure
I really think all pseudonyms should automatically pound-redirect to the person's official name. Because those pages really are still frivolous. If you think your pseudonyms are so important to be mentioned, give them a section, or put an "Also known as" at the top of your article. Gryphon the Pure- Shirithian Elder - Dutch of Kildare - Minister of the Interior - High Priest of Apostrophe aka Grammar Fuhrer - Director of the Shirithian Census - Imperial Advisor -q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 1:52 pm
by Sebastien Alexandre
I think it would do some good, and making you log on woul dhelp as well, although I admit I have forgotten once or twice to log in
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:51 pm
by Shyriath
Yeah, I've forgotten to log in a few times too. Still, this is a good idea; the tinier articles lying around make me seethe. Scott's proposed alterations to the bill should be kept in mind, however.
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:42 am
by AngelGuardian93
I agree. There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:12 pm
by osmose1000
This'd go under ministerial policies, instead of a landsraad act, and as a half-minister over the wiki(it is part of the website) I'ma put the login restriction on now, just to stop the damn ads. And Yardistan votes Aye (7) to this, provided Scott's edits are implemented. They call it a signature, but no one ever signs their posts...
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 4:03 am
by Gryphon the Pure
MorEastern Kildare votes YEA (0), provided Scott's edits. Gryphon the Pure- Shirithian Elder - Dutch of Kildare - Minister of the Interior - High Priest of Apostrophe aka Grammar Fuhrer - Director of the Shirithian Census - Imperial Advisor -q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);q=parseInt(Math.random()*gryphSig.length);q=(isNaN(q))?0:q;document.write(gryphSig[q]);
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:04 am
by Fax Celestis
Greater Brookshire egotistically votes AYE (6). Blindness Is A Blessing
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:12 pm
by Shyriath
Muad'di- ...er, Naudia'Diva votes AYE (2), provided Scott's suggestions are implemented.
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:42 pm
by Fax Celestis
To note: Scott's suggestions are now within the text. Blindness Is A Blessing
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 6:06 pm
by AngelGuardian93
BAM, aye, 3. There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:16 am
by Hypatia Agnesi
Kildare says, "Oh, shit, I didn't vote yet," and votesAYE (9) *throws grenade for the hell of it*BO0O0O0O0/\/\!!!!!!
Re: Wiki Restriction Act
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:21 pm
by Hypatia Agnesi
Ok, getting back to my job and all...This vote has PASSED.Aye: 27Nay: 0Abstain: 0 *throws grenade for the hell of it*BO0O0O0O0/\/\!!!!!!