Page 1 of 1

Landsraad 3: Voting Period

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:39 pm
by Kaiseress Semisa I
Article 2, Section B, Clause 1

From:
A standard bill shall be on the voting floor for four (4) days. The Praetor may exte]nd a standard bill to seven (7) days if and only if he or she believes that nobles with an active interest in it have not gotten a chance to vote, and that these nobles could significantly impact the outcome. He or she may do this at any point within seven days of the vote having been brought to the floor. When a bill has exhausted its respective time limit, the Pr�tor shall declare the vote passed or failed based upon the votes it has received, close it, and archive it. If the Praetor fails to do so, the vote is nevertheless considered unofficially closed.
To:
Any bill shall remain before the Landsraad for four (4) days. The Praetor may extend a standard bill to six (6) days if and only if he or she believes that nobles with an active interest in it have not gotten a chance to vote, and that these nobles could significantly impact the outcome. He or she may do this at any point within the initial four days days of the vote having been brought to the floor. When a bill has exhausted its respective time limit, the Praetor shall declare the vote passed or failed based upon the votes it has received, close it, and archive it. If the Praetor fails to do so, the vote is nevertheless considered unofficially closed.
Reason: Clarification, shortening of duration, tightening of extension.

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:44 am
by RicLyon
Muy bien.

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 6:12 pm
by Shyriath
*Nods* It'll work.

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:45 pm
by AngelGuardian93
'Ditto' says the parrot. There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:48 pm
by RicLyon
Who are you parrotting?

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:51 pm
by AngelGuardian93
referring to the other threads I posted in. There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 1:06 pm
by RicLyon
Ahhhhhh

Re: Restructuring the Landsraad III

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 3:10 pm
by darthmiho
No problems here, mien kaiseress.

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:57 am
by Delphi
I see a slight problem, with the wording. In the first one, it specifically states it's talking about the voting time. In the new version, the first sentence just says "shall remain before the Landsraad", which could mean in voting or in debate.

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 9:07 am
by Kaiseress Semisa I
That's because another proposal combines the two times.

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:28 am
by Delphi
*passes out from all the proposals*

Which one is that?

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:33 am
by Kaiseress Semisa I
That would be RtL:V.