Page 1 of 1
Re: Wikki questions
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:44 am
by Fax Celestis
Mr. Jacobus:Perhaps if your articles were evenhanded themselves (instead of counterpropoganda), they wouldn't need to be edited in the first place.Also: since Jack has been doing more than dumping in just his own personal information (by this, I mean editing other's articles and cleaning markup, spelling, grammar, et al.), and because I like his style, and because I can trust him, I decided to make him part of the WikiManagement.Unfortunately, you do not display the same qualities.Perhaps you should come back to complain when you have something to complain about.-James RaineWikiManager Viatax Sitadi Axdivijink Regigoraauk
Wikki questions
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:26 pm
by ancientcyberian
Is there to be any attempt at evenhandedness in the area of the history of areas outside of Shireroth? I refer in particular to the ongoing effort by particular individuals to delete my eyewitness accounts of events in Cyberian history. I have no objections to the condensing of certain articles to conform to the format laid out by the mgmt.. However, the addition of Jack to that mgmt. ,(whom I assume to be Jack Santucci, President of the VCC and hardly an objective observer) lead me to believe that the Government of Shireroth now intends the wiki to become a propaganda flak for the VCC.If this is the case, I'm used to our adversaries corrupting truth, or any attempt at evenhandedness. Despite my mixed experiences in Shireroth, I have always respected the majority of Shiririthians as worthy sorts, and seen Shireroth as a center of (relative) sanity and civilization.The wise man saith, "Cast not thy pearls before the swine, nor thy precious things before dogs, lest they turn and rend thee."If Shireroth is now a partner in the VCC program of re-writing history to suit themselves, a simple admission of the fact herein will be sufficient to cause me to shake the dust from off my feet and move on.Oinkest thou, Shireroth?
Re: Wikki questions
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:31 am
by ancientcyberian
Dear Mr. Fax:You have just answered my question. I went out of my way to make my contributions neutral and accurate. Since you did not witness the events in question, your assesment of my views is simply one of prefering one individual over another. It's your football, and you are welcome to it.Jack is intelligent and talented, but his relationship to the truth is at best, Cilntonesque. His best quality is that he looks honest standing next to Grieve.Big Brother would be very proud of the three of you. Good-bye.
Re: Wikki questions
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:51 am
by osmose1000
Dear Mr.Jacobus:Yeah. Fuck you too.Love, Moose They call it a signature, but no one ever signs their posts...
Re: Wikki questions
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:55 pm
by Fax Celestis
Perhaps my reasoning, detailed below, will help you understand: 1. There are many Cyberians, and one Jacobus. Please the many, not the few. 2. You have been known to cause problems elsewhere, including events I have witnessed first-hand. Conversely, Jack has done nothing of the sort (at least not in my sphere of knowledge). I would go so far as to say you seem to make it your goal in life to bother people. 3. If you had used the Wiki for more than promoting your own agenda, this probably wouldn't have happened. Too bad. Viatax Sitadi Axdivijink Regigoraauk
Re: Wikki questions
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:24 pm
by Hypatia Agnesi
To the best of my knowledge, Jacobus is also still banned from Shireroth for causing trouble both here and abroad, many times. He needs to go. *throws grenade for the hell of it*BO0O0O0O0/\/\!!!!!!