Shireroth

The forum is telling me that I can't add administrators and moderators to my foes list (ignore list). But there are certain admins and moderators I don't want to deal with any more. Is there any way to get around this restriction?

I have no idea.

We seek to trap Malliki, but they dart and leap.
YOU cannot trap Malliki... do not even try.
I do not think you can even touch them; you are not quite solid enough.

I think that means 'No'. I didn't even know we had that feature at all. And honestly, I don't like it. Avoiding a problem doesn't solve it.

FAIRLY SURE SOMEONE WHO LOOKS THROUGH BACKLOGS FOR THEIR OWN NAME ISN'T GOING TO ACTUALLY BLOCK SOMEONE AND DENY THEMSELVES ACCESS TO WHAT HE'S SAYING ANYWAY.

Y'know, I don't actually look through backlogs for my own name. I just read the backlogs and inevitably someone's talking about me

Kind of like how Ari pretends to be on LoA, but when I post a request here he knows exactly what the context behind it is.

Ari is wise in many things.

Don't read the backlogs.

That's like saying don't read the newspaper because it all happened yesterday.

More like don't go listen to a recording made of a conversation you were not a part of, nor asked to listen too. The recording is there, but why should you go listen to it?

Don't read the backlogs.

If only it were that easy. I'm an infoholic. If there's potentially relevant information, it's like a compulsion for me to read it. It's why I still check the forums of micronations I haven't cared about in years.

Relevant information in #micronations? You got to be joking. If you can't stay away from the logs you shouldn't complain.

I don't, until stuff that happens there spills out onto the forums.

Which it didn't in this case.

...I could have sworn you knew about that whole "CJ Miller" incident.

The only reason it spilled over here was because you felt a need to defend a racist you've never talked to.

Oh come on, Malliki, the rest of us are trying to let that whole issue drop. Let it go. Go find an autistic kid to bully or something.

I actually laughed at that. I'm going to try this sometime. I'm going to continue make comments about something, and when I get a reply, I'm going to tell people to drop it.

Personally I love how everything else CJ says is an obvious troll attempt but his claim to have asperger's is 100% untouchable genuine fact.

I actually laughed at that. I'm going to try this sometime. I'm going to continue make comments about something, and when I get a reply, I'm going to tell people to drop it.

It's called use-mention distinction. Erik and I were mentioning the CJ affair in the context of whether events in the chat impact on the rest of the country, and then you came in and starting blabbing about how you were right and I was wrong about CJ and ohmigod Scott defends racists and generally pouring salt in wounds the rest of the country is trying to close.

It's like you saying that you read Conservatives are up two points in the polls today, me saying CONSERVATIVES ARE STUPID AND YOU ARE STUPID FOR SUPPORTING THEM, and then me accusing you of starting a political argument because you said the word "conservative" first.