Page 1 of 1

Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:49 pm
by Erik Mortis
This resolution is to state the Landsraad's outrage over the Kaiser's blatant disregard for Shireroth tradition and history in his attempt to replace the Shirerothian flag.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:34 pm
by Erik Mortis
Dolor, Aye (2).

This shall be the last vote cast by Dolor within the Landsraad until such time as Imperial Decree #425 is repeal/amended and Kaiser Leto III no longer sits upon the throne. From this point on Dolor is in true rebellion and boycott of the government of Leto III.

http://shireroth.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=158&t=12588

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:44 pm
by Harvey Steffke
Parvatvana AYE (3), with similar reasoning and consequence.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:53 pm
by AryezturMejorkhor
Goldshire (4)- Aye

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:09 am
by Scott of Hyperborea
Straylight likes the new flag, but disagrees (respectfully) with the Kaiser's decision to decree it unilaterally. Since the resolution was framed as joint outrage at both, Straylight courteously abstains (10)

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:33 am
by Kaiser Leto III
Can the Landsraad vote about an Imperial decree? This smells like... democracy! :angry :p


EDIT: We should ignore the votes of the rebels, as they are boycotting the Shirerithian institutions. :evil

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:18 am
by Malliki Tosha
It could, but it would be a non-binding sense of the Landsraad resolution.

And, Your Niftiness, I advise you not to interfere with internal Landsraad matters.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:48 am
by Leo Fenrir
Malliki Tosha wrote:It could, but it would be a non-binding sense of the Landsraad resolution.
Unacceptable.

I urge the citizens of Shireroth to join the rebellion and overturn this tyrant who would destroy our culture.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:53 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Now that the decree is repealed, the Landsraad could pass an act with the same content. However, the Landsraad cannot hold a binding vote concerning an imperial decree. The Kaiser is supreme.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:39 pm
by Daniel Farewell
The issue is moot.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:16 pm
by Harvey Steffke
Technically it's not. This was a resolution to issue a protest, nothing more. If you do not feel the protest is needed, you can vote NAY.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:18 pm
by Malliki Tosha
It is moot, since the decree was repealed. What is the point of protesting against something that is not in effect anymore?

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:20 pm
by Harvey Steffke
To prove that we can, and so that we can have the protest go down on the books and in history as having been made.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:21 pm
by Malliki Tosha
G. Lakhesis (2) - Nay

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:03 am
by Daniel Farewell
Brookshire - Nay (6)

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:14 am
by Ryan
Yardistan, Nay (10)

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:06 pm
by W.Payne
Kildare (10) votes NAY.

Re: Protest of Imperial Decree #425.

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 3:18 pm
by Allot
This bill fails 9-28-10 abstaining. :smashy