Page 1 of 1
Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:20 pm
by Erik Mortis
As Ari brought the matter up for discussion at the front gate I bring it to the Kehl.
I suggest the following be law in Brookshire.
In order to be a noble or count within Brookshire your primary residency must be Brookshire. Further a noble or count of Brookshire may not be a noble or count in any other sub-division.
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:05 pm
by Malliki Tosha
I suggest the following amendment:
1. In order to be a title holder within Brookshire, your primary residency must be Brookshire.
2. A title holder in Brookshire may not be a title holder in any other subdivision.
3. "Title holder" shall be interpreted as a title equal in rank to the traditional titles of Count or Baron, or any other such title that from time to time may be created in Shireroth.
4. Edict XXIII is hereby repealed.
Is this amendment accepted as friendly by Lord Dolor?
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:26 pm
by Erik Mortis
Looks to be basically the same thing. So yes!
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:33 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Good. I move for a vote. Can I get a second?
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:13 pm
by Harald of Froyalan
Second.
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:37 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Greater Lakhesis (2) - Aye
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:26 am
by Erik Mortis
Dolor, AYE (2).
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:26 am
by Arviður
K'Tzuni, AYE (2).
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 2:43 pm
by Harald of Froyalan
Crestfall Downs - Aye (1)
Re: Residency Requirement for nobles and counts.
Posted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:00 am
by Thomas Gaudin
Woodshire, AYE (1)