Page 3 of 3

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:56 am
by Erik Mortis
We should also make sure we have jurists from DIFFERENT nations.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:10 am
by Malliki Tosha
Yeah. I'm a candidate as everyone should know by now.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:09 am
by Aster
My government would be strongly against any such component being instated within the Small Commonwealth. We are interested in it as an economic organisation and a way to strengthen our relationships with its member states - we will not have any quarter with any citizens being subdued to any court which is not Pan-Micran or Ashkenatzi.

...don't shoot the messenger...

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:10 am
by Jonas
You aren't forced to join the treaty.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:18 am
by Malliki Tosha
Aster wrote:My government would be strongly against any such component being instated within the Small Commonwealth. We are interested in it as an economic organisation and a way to strengthen our relationships with its member states - we will not have any quarter with any citizens being subdued to any court which is not Pan-Micran or Ashkenatzi.

...don't shoot the messenger...
Are you, by chance, Antican as well? Starting to sound like it.

As Jonas says, there is no requirement to join the Court Convention. If Ashkenatza wishes to stay out of the Court, you are most welcome to do so. The Court will have no jurisdiction over Ashkenatza in that case. I suggest you read the treaties and conventions before you draw premature conclusions.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:46 pm
by Aster
No need to become so hostile, Herr Tosha! :knife

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:51 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Likewise, Mr. Aster. :p You need to read the treaties before you get all antsy.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:02 pm
by Aster
Further discussions have been initiated in Kolmenitsky, but I doubt that the outcome will be a YEA. However, it is an intriguing proposition.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:17 pm
by Andreas the Wise
Well, the rather interesting idea about this court is that nations have agreed to it (as opposed to all the other attempts to set up a UN sort of court) and have something more than just the court holding them together ... so I think it'll actually work (unlike the last however many YAMO courts). Or at least function tolerably for as long as the SC lasts.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:07 pm
by Erik Mortis
It's already got two nations signed on.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:13 pm
by Malliki Tosha
Two more on the way, at least.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:03 am
by Björn Ironfist
Stormark's legislature has passed this (5-0-2). Since the Emperor was one who voted in favor, I can safely assume he will provide his Imperial Assent. So we can officially count Stormark on board.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:38 am
by Erik Mortis
Well, I'll add you to the list once you've updated your thread in the repository.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:06 am
by Malliki Tosha
We now have five signatory nations to this treaty (Shireroth, Stormark, Hurmu, Nelaga and Amokolia). Are we going to get this moving or what?

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:21 pm
by Erik Mortis
I guess so.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:23 pm
by Jonas
Batavia has also signed it (our representative is waiting for the signature of the King). ;)

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:26 pm
by Erik Mortis
Well, let us know when it is formalized.

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:16 pm
by Maximilian
We will ;)