Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

The judiciary, for settling disputes and feudal contracts

Moderator: CJ Miller

Malliki
Posts: 1822
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Brookshire Hamlet
Contact:

Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Malliki »

Just to calm down Jake and everyone, this is just a preliminary hearing. I wish to hear from the general populace, as well as from certain office holders and members of the Mango Bar, their views on the actions of "Quxark" and if they can be considered to be "spamming". If so, he could be charged with terrorism.

But again, this is just a preliminary hearing. Partly to give me something to do as well. :)

So, the word is free as we say.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD

User avatar
Bacchus
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Bacchus »

He mentioned Dionysus in one of his posts, so I believe he's probably just a poor guy that can't properly interpret the message of the god.

However, from a more objective point of view, I would not call this spam. Or if it is, it certainly isn't malicious, and to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong. Someone posting messages in a really small, blue font with a stutter (or is it meant to be correcting spelling mistakes? I don't know) is barely even noticable.
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan

Malliki
Posts: 1822
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Brookshire Hamlet
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Malliki »

A most valid point. I'm just so freakin' bored so I need something to do.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD

User avatar
Bacchus
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Bacchus »

Don't, don't, DON'T say that. Why don't you just say it clear as day: "Jake, please make trouble!" :p
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan

Malliki
Posts: 1822
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Brookshire Hamlet
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Malliki »

I don't have to. He always causes trouble anyway. :) Perhaps I should charge him with something... :D Just for fun.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD

User avatar
Ari Rahikkala
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Ari Rahikkala »

FWIW Quxark is posting from the same IP address as Austi recently.

I'm holding out hope zie's a different person though, because if so, Quxark is exactly the right one to be Count of Blavatsky now that I'm starting to maybe have some kind of a vague idea what I want out of it (read: Whatever Quxark will provide :)).
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.

Malliki
Posts: 1822
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:00 pm
Location: Brookshire Hamlet
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Malliki »

I know. Good for Austi that he's found something he likes to do.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Don't, don't, DON'T say that. Why don't you just say it clear as day: "Jake, please make trouble!"
(Loki appears in a cloud of smoke)

Cough....Cough....Cough....

Ahem.

You rang?

The Judex is correct in attempting to eschew boredom, or September,

http://www.shireroth.org/shirewiki/September

as we used to called it. However, since the current Kaiser used to speak in ALL CAPS, AND A GUD FREND OV MYNE TAKS LIK THIZ, I think that our new friend Quxark
talking like this should not even be of more than a smile and a passing interest.

If indeed the IP matches Austi's , this is mere circumstance. I knew several fellows who used to live in or under trees. They used to post at the library, or from an office, and literally lots of people could be posting from that IP.

In fact, there are 17 entities leaning over my shoulder trying to take the keybard out of my hands as we speak.

Pardon me a moment.
:smashy :smashy
(Crashing, banging noises followed by muffled shouts and screams.)

We now return you to our judical system.

(column of smoke forms, followed by coughing, followed by......)

User avatar
Leo Fenrir
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Echo Manor, Nordland

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Leo Fenrir »

Bacchus wrote: to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong
But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.

But if it is a law suit you are looking for then I should inform you that I have been considering weather or not to take legal action against the Duke of Elwynn for monetary compensation for the neglect of his duchy under the pretenses of: kidnapping or possession.

Oh and jake, consider yourself officially hired. Details of certain jobs I may have for you will be sent by PM which you can accept or decline at your discretion. :yay:
Leo Fenrir

User avatar
Kaiseress Anandja I
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Kaiseress Anandja I »

I believe that we should love Quxark for the person he is. He may be a bit misguided, he might even look a bit too far down the bottle, but I believe that he is good at heart. He needs guidance, not a law suit.

Peace and Love,

Anandja

User avatar
Leo Fenrir
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Echo Manor, Nordland

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Leo Fenrir »

My god.... A hippy....

...
...




......
.



.
:yay:
Leo Fenrir

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Well, Steward?
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.

User avatar
Leo Fenrir
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Echo Manor, Nordland

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Leo Fenrir »

I'm sorry I find myself quite lacking in reading subtext and I do fear that I have missed the pertinent question you may have wished to ask.
Leo Fenrir

User avatar
Kaiseress Anandja I
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Kaiseress Anandja I »

I think that the wonderful Sir Jacobus is wondering if you will take action against me. I do beseech thee though, I am but a faithful servant of Shireroth, hearing the cry of the people.
Love and Happiness,

Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Oy Vey.

User avatar
Allot
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Allot »

Leo wrote:But if it is a law suit you are looking for then I should inform you that I have been considering weather or not to take legal action against the Duke of Elwynn for monetary compensation for the neglect of his duchy under the pretenses of: kidnapping or possession.
WHAT? :angry
PREPARE FOR THE SMACKDOWN, STEWARD
As Jacobus said
Khan! Bring me my crap-hammer!

User avatar
Leo Fenrir
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Echo Manor, Nordland

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Leo Fenrir »

Allot wrote:PREPARE FOR THE SMACKDOWN, STEWARD
Now now lets not get ahead of ourselves here, assuming you have won before you start is first off quite pretentious of you and secondly not prudent on your behalf.

And aren't you supposed to be convulsing in a carriage halfway across Nordland right now?
Leo Fenrir

User avatar
Allot
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Allot »

That's why I've stopped signing my posts... you need to differentiate between my RP figure (in Elwynn) and my non-RP figure (rest of Shireroth). That's why I created William.

Jess
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:00 pm
Location: A flying Airbus A380 above Micras
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jess »

Crucify Him!
Jess,
<insert titles here>
Governor of Amokolia

Quxark
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Quxark »

"He mentioned Dionysus in one of his posts, so I believe he's probably just a poor guy that can't properly interpret the message of the god."

http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/6630/ancient.html
Ancient Wines - The so-called "European grape", Vitis vinifera, originated not in Europe but in the Black Sea region, and spread from there south to the Middle East so that by 6,000 BC grape vines were being cultivated in Mesopotamia. The vinifera grape then spread east to Phoenicia and Egypt, and by 2,000 BC Phoenician sailors were ferrying grapevines across the Mediterranean Sea to Greece and beyond Although many early civilizations make reference to wine, the ancient Greeks were the first to take their grape growing and winemaking seriously The importance of wine to Greek culture is evident in that they had a god of the vine named Dionysus (later Bacchus) who oversaw the cultivation of vineyards and the merriment of drinking

Di Di Dion Dion Dionysus and Ba Bac Bacchus Bacchus are no noooo nothing but u u u usurpers 4000 ye years late

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, graaapesssss................ungnnnnnn

User avatar
Bacchus
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Bacchus »

Leo wrote:But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.
In law, this basic premise I wholeheartedly agree with, but it's a different story in micronational or more specifically Shirerithian law. Observe this statute:
LB I.C wrote:1. Should anyone break a law, but do so either as part of a non-malicious act or for reasons that are obviously good ones and beneficial to the nation, they will not be considered guilty and will not be subject to the normal punishment.
2. Whether a certain incident was part of a non-malicious act or beneficial to the nation will be under the discretion of whatever judiciary bodies exist at the time the incident took place, as well as the Kaiser.
I conclude from this that it doesn't matter whether someone takes offence at an act or whatever, but the Judex and/or the Kaiser can consider that when they are deciding whether something is malicious or not. Make sense?
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan

User avatar
Leo Fenrir
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Location: Echo Manor, Nordland

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Leo Fenrir »

It is a quite reasonable statement and obviously crafted to instigate activity. Just to clear it up I personally don't see anything wrong with your actions. I just can't resist a good argument.

Allot however is a different story altogether.
Leo Fenrir

User avatar
Bacchus
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 10:54 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Bacchus »

Uh, just so we're clear, who were you addressing in that last post? I would assume Quxark given the thread, but my ego and the context and the words make me wonder.
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan

User avatar
Allot
Posts: 1413
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
Contact:

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Allot »

Since we no longer have an Arbiter or an Imperial Inquisitor, there is no one pressing this trial at the moment.

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

(Appropriates large chair)

Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?

Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth

User avatar
Kaiseress Anandja I
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Kaiseress Anandja I »

Sadly, my dear Jacobus, you are not eligible for the job since you are my Steward. I will however make sure we have a new Arbiter as soon as possible.
Love and Happiness,

Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis

User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Jacobus Loki »

No, Your Niftyness, I would make a poor Arbtiter, since I reach for my Sword faster than the lawbook.

User avatar
Kaiseress Anandja I
Posts: 695
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Kaiseress Anandja I »

Jacobus Loki wrote:(Appropriates large chair)

Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?

Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth
I thought that was the list, dear Jacobus. :D

This thread is un-stickied and the preliminary hearing closed. Quxark is free to do whatever he wants (that is reasonably legal).
Love and Happiness,

Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis

Quxark
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark

Post by Quxark »

"reasonably legal" .... a aha ha I sha shall loo looo looooook for two th th th thi thing things

Post Reply

Return to “Imperial Judex”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest