Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Moderator: CJ Miller
Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Just to calm down Jake and everyone, this is just a preliminary hearing. I wish to hear from the general populace, as well as from certain office holders and members of the Mango Bar, their views on the actions of "Quxark" and if they can be considered to be "spamming". If so, he could be charged with terrorism.
But again, this is just a preliminary hearing. Partly to give me something to do as well.
So, the word is free as we say.
But again, this is just a preliminary hearing. Partly to give me something to do as well.
So, the word is free as we say.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
He mentioned Dionysus in one of his posts, so I believe he's probably just a poor guy that can't properly interpret the message of the god.
However, from a more objective point of view, I would not call this spam. Or if it is, it certainly isn't malicious, and to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong. Someone posting messages in a really small, blue font with a stutter (or is it meant to be correcting spelling mistakes? I don't know) is barely even noticable.
However, from a more objective point of view, I would not call this spam. Or if it is, it certainly isn't malicious, and to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong. Someone posting messages in a really small, blue font with a stutter (or is it meant to be correcting spelling mistakes? I don't know) is barely even noticable.
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
A most valid point. I'm just so freakin' bored so I need something to do.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Don't, don't, DON'T say that. Why don't you just say it clear as day: "Jake, please make trouble!"
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I don't have to. He always causes trouble anyway. Perhaps I should charge him with something... Just for fun.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
- Ari Rahikkala
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
FWIW Quxark is posting from the same IP address as Austi recently.
I'm holding out hope zie's a different person though, because if so, Quxark is exactly the right one to be Count of Blavatsky now that I'm starting to maybe have some kind of a vague idea what I want out of it (read: Whatever Quxark will provide ).
I'm holding out hope zie's a different person though, because if so, Quxark is exactly the right one to be Count of Blavatsky now that I'm starting to maybe have some kind of a vague idea what I want out of it (read: Whatever Quxark will provide ).
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I know. Good for Austi that he's found something he likes to do.
His Grace the Lord Brookshire, LK GMNS
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
Arbiter, Imperial Judex
Duke of Brookshire, Baron of Lakhesis
Knight of the Dragon
Fan of SOAD
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
(Loki appears in a cloud of smoke)Don't, don't, DON'T say that. Why don't you just say it clear as day: "Jake, please make trouble!"
Cough....Cough....Cough....
Ahem.
You rang?
The Judex is correct in attempting to eschew boredom, or September,
http://www.shireroth.org/shirewiki/September
as we used to called it. However, since the current Kaiser used to speak in ALL CAPS, AND A GUD FREND OV MYNE TAKS LIK THIZ, I think that our new friend Quxark
talking like this should not even be of more than a smile and a passing interest.
If indeed the IP matches Austi's , this is mere circumstance. I knew several fellows who used to live in or under trees. They used to post at the library, or from an office, and literally lots of people could be posting from that IP.
In fact, there are 17 entities leaning over my shoulder trying to take the keybard out of my hands as we speak.
Pardon me a moment.
(Crashing, banging noises followed by muffled shouts and screams.)
We now return you to our judical system.
(column of smoke forms, followed by coughing, followed by......)
- Leo Fenrir
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
- Location: Echo Manor, Nordland
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.Bacchus wrote: to punish something that lacks malicious intent would be overzealous and wrong
But if it is a law suit you are looking for then I should inform you that I have been considering weather or not to take legal action against the Duke of Elwynn for monetary compensation for the neglect of his duchy under the pretenses of: kidnapping or possession.
Oh and jake, consider yourself officially hired. Details of certain jobs I may have for you will be sent by PM which you can accept or decline at your discretion.
Leo Fenrir
- Kaiseress Anandja I
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I believe that we should love Quxark for the person he is. He may be a bit misguided, he might even look a bit too far down the bottle, but I believe that he is good at heart. He needs guidance, not a law suit.
Peace and Love,
Anandja
Peace and Love,
Anandja
- Leo Fenrir
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
- Location: Echo Manor, Nordland
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
My god.... A hippy....
...
...
......
.
.
...
...
......
.
.
Leo Fenrir
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Well, Steward?
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
- Leo Fenrir
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
- Location: Echo Manor, Nordland
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I'm sorry I find myself quite lacking in reading subtext and I do fear that I have missed the pertinent question you may have wished to ask.
Leo Fenrir
- Kaiseress Anandja I
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I think that the wonderful Sir Jacobus is wondering if you will take action against me. I do beseech thee though, I am but a faithful servant of Shireroth, hearing the cry of the people.
Love and Happiness,
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
- Allot
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
- Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
- Contact:
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
WHAT?Leo wrote:But if it is a law suit you are looking for then I should inform you that I have been considering weather or not to take legal action against the Duke of Elwynn for monetary compensation for the neglect of his duchy under the pretenses of: kidnapping or possession.
PREPARE FOR THE SMACKDOWN, STEWARD
As Jacobus said
Khan! Bring me my crap-hammer!
- Leo Fenrir
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
- Location: Echo Manor, Nordland
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Now now lets not get ahead of ourselves here, assuming you have won before you start is first off quite pretentious of you and secondly not prudent on your behalf.Allot wrote:PREPARE FOR THE SMACKDOWN, STEWARD
And aren't you supposed to be convulsing in a carriage halfway across Nordland right now?
Leo Fenrir
- Allot
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
- Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
- Contact:
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
That's why I've stopped signing my posts... you need to differentiate between my RP figure (in Elwynn) and my non-RP figure (rest of Shireroth). That's why I created William.
-
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:00 pm
- Location: A flying Airbus A380 above Micras
- Contact:
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Crucify Him!
Jess,
<insert titles here>
Governor of Amokolia
<insert titles here>
Governor of Amokolia
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
"He mentioned Dionysus in one of his posts, so I believe he's probably just a poor guy that can't properly interpret the message of the god."
http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/6630/ancient.html
Ancient Wines - The so-called "European grape", Vitis vinifera, originated not in Europe but in the Black Sea region, and spread from there south to the Middle East so that by 6,000 BC grape vines were being cultivated in Mesopotamia. The vinifera grape then spread east to Phoenicia and Egypt, and by 2,000 BC Phoenician sailors were ferrying grapevines across the Mediterranean Sea to Greece and beyond Although many early civilizations make reference to wine, the ancient Greeks were the first to take their grape growing and winemaking seriously The importance of wine to Greek culture is evident in that they had a god of the vine named Dionysus (later Bacchus) who oversaw the cultivation of vineyards and the merriment of drinking
Di Di Dion Dion Dionysus and Ba Bac Bacchus Bacchus are no noooo nothing but u u u usurpers 4000 ye years late
http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/6630/ancient.html
Ancient Wines - The so-called "European grape", Vitis vinifera, originated not in Europe but in the Black Sea region, and spread from there south to the Middle East so that by 6,000 BC grape vines were being cultivated in Mesopotamia. The vinifera grape then spread east to Phoenicia and Egypt, and by 2,000 BC Phoenician sailors were ferrying grapevines across the Mediterranean Sea to Greece and beyond Although many early civilizations make reference to wine, the ancient Greeks were the first to take their grape growing and winemaking seriously The importance of wine to Greek culture is evident in that they had a god of the vine named Dionysus (later Bacchus) who oversaw the cultivation of vineyards and the merriment of drinking
Di Di Dion Dion Dionysus and Ba Bac Bacchus Bacchus are no noooo nothing but u u u usurpers 4000 ye years late
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, graaapesssss................ungnnnnnn
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
In law, this basic premise I wholeheartedly agree with, but it's a different story in micronational or more specifically Shirerithian law. Observe this statute:Leo wrote:But there is an inherent flaw with this statement. Someone could do something he or she considers right or morally good but in other's views their actions could be evil. It is important, especially in law, to distinguish motives and actions, as the two are more often then not, contradictory or incomprehensibly related.
I conclude from this that it doesn't matter whether someone takes offence at an act or whatever, but the Judex and/or the Kaiser can consider that when they are deciding whether something is malicious or not. Make sense?LB I.C wrote:1. Should anyone break a law, but do so either as part of a non-malicious act or for reasons that are obviously good ones and beneficial to the nation, they will not be considered guilty and will not be subject to the normal punishment.
2. Whether a certain incident was part of a non-malicious act or beneficial to the nation will be under the discretion of whatever judiciary bodies exist at the time the incident took place, as well as the Kaiser.
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
- Leo Fenrir
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:12 pm
- Location: Echo Manor, Nordland
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
It is a quite reasonable statement and obviously crafted to instigate activity. Just to clear it up I personally don't see anything wrong with your actions. I just can't resist a good argument.
Allot however is a different story altogether.
Allot however is a different story altogether.
Leo Fenrir
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Uh, just so we're clear, who were you addressing in that last post? I would assume Quxark given the thread, but my ego and the context and the words make me wonder.
The High Priest of Bacchus, or Dionysos Eleutherios, the bull-horned god
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
The poster formerly known as Benkern
Eaaaaohhh! Join in the dance!
official representative of the Channel Islanders in Yardistan
- Allot
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:50 pm
- Location: Araxion Fortress, Iserdia, Elwynn
- Contact:
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Since we no longer have an Arbiter or an Imperial Inquisitor, there is no one pressing this trial at the moment.
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
(Appropriates large chair)
Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?
Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth
Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?
Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth
- Kaiseress Anandja I
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
Sadly, my dear Jacobus, you are not eligible for the job since you are my Steward. I will however make sure we have a new Arbiter as soon as possible.
Love and Happiness,
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
- Jacobus Loki
- Posts: 4205
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
No, Your Niftyness, I would make a poor Arbtiter, since I reach for my Sword faster than the lawbook.
- Kaiseress Anandja I
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 2:47 pm
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
I thought that was the list, dear Jacobus.Jacobus Loki wrote:(Appropriates large chair)
Perhaps we should present Her Niftyness with candidates for the job?
Jacobus Loki
Steward of Shireroth
This thread is un-stickied and the preliminary hearing closed. Quxark is free to do whatever he wants (that is reasonably legal).
Love and Happiness,
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
Kaiseress Anandja I
Marchioness of Goldshire
Baroness of Lakhesis
Re: Preliminary Hearing: Imperial Republic v. Quxark
"reasonably legal" .... a aha ha I sha shall loo looo looooook for two th th th thi thing things
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests