Yet the Lawbook clearly says "Rebelling to overthrow the legitimate Kaiser of Shireroth without his/her consent is prohibited." I personally always read this as having the words "*wink* *wink*" at the end, and probably most of the rest of us did too. But now that we're on a Crusade Against Common Sense or whatever it is that's going on in the Judex these days, some day people are going to forget the *wink* *wink* and actually read that as literally prohibiting rebellion. And that would be a disaster.
I propose editing that section of the Lawbook to read:
This essentially makes rebellion nominally illegal but removes the possibility of serious penalty. It assures that disruptive rebellions (like constantly posting "DOWN WITH THE KAISER" on every thread or continuing to rebel long after the time when everyone else is bored with it can still be punished. It should also be noted that if a rebellion fails and the people on top dislike it, they can of course still strip the rebels of their titles if they want to. They're just not *required* to take any action.E. Rebellion
1. Rebellion to overthrow a legitimate Kaiser, Duke, or Baron is prohibited.
a. The maximum penalty for this offense shall be honorary Yardistani citizenship and consideration for induction into the Lodge of Mischevious Intent
2. Any rebellion that becomes a nuisance or a disruption to ordinary public life can be charged with the separate crime of Disrupting the Forum.
a. The penalty for Disrupting the Forum can be a warning, a fine, or a ban, depending on the judgment of the Judex.
The penalty for repeat offense in this category can be anything up to exile from the State.
b. If a rebellion continues for more than one month, the Judex may at his judgment deem it Disruptive to the Forum.