Re: Treaty.

For commoners to suggest and discuss Landsraad bills

Moderators: Jonas, CJ Miller

Post Reply
Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: Treaty.

Post by Erik Mortis »

http://shireroth.kuroshiro.net/forum/vi ... f=5&t=9709

I don't think we should be involved in this treaty.

1. It's far to fantasy oriented. Anti-Grav generators? Seriously. We should try to maintain some credibility when it comes to treaties..

2. I hate solorolililoism... whatever.. so I don't like the idea of officially supporting it.
2b. Endorsing another religion other then Cedrism is heresy!

3. The Jasonia stuff is okey I guess. I was there. I remember.

User avatar
Harvey Steffke
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: Treaty.

Post by Harvey Steffke »

While I thank the good Kaiser for his concern, I do not feel that Shireroth's support of that treaty is necessary.

Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: Treaty.

Post by Erik Mortis »

*is confused*

Wait... you're not arguing with me on this? (though i suspect our motives are NOT the same)

User avatar
Andreas the Wise
Posts: 5253
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
Contact:

Re: Treaty.

Post by Andreas the Wise »

I'm fairly sure they aren't either. I also don't feel Shireroth's support is necessary, for a third reason.
The character Andreas the Wise is on indefinite leave.
However, this account still manages:
Cla'Udi - Count of Melangia
Manuel - CEO of VBNC. For all you'll ever need.
Vincent Waldgrave - Lord General of Gralus
Q - Director of SAMIN
Duke Mel'Kat - Air Pirate, Melangian, and Duke of the Flying Duchy of Glanurchy

And references may be made to Vur'Alm Xei'Bôn (a Nelagan Micron of undisclosed purpose).

User avatar
Harvey Steffke
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: Treaty.

Post by Harvey Steffke »

Shireroth is not being asked to sign the treaty, merely witness it. The treaty already exists between two other nations. It would be nice if Shireroth supported it, but since the objections you made represent your true feelings on the matter, there's no particular need to push the point as it ultimately wouldn't affect the outcome. I'd rather the treaty be supported by people that believe it wholeheartedly rather than people that feel they were cajoled or politically maneuvered into backing it.

If enough people feel differently than you Erik and want to back the treaty, well, that's okay too. But I'm not going to argue the point either way.

And no, our motives are probably not the same. But I do appreciate the honesty.

Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: Treaty.

Post by Erik Mortis »

I don't hide it anymore.

And to be honest. I have no power these days, so my speaking against supporting it is just my opinion. It's the Kaiser and Dukes that matter. You could argue for it to them. Honestly, I wasn't planning to say much more then I did. I said my piece.

btw. Good to see ya Jason. :p

Post Reply

Return to “Landsraad Front Gate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests