Page 1 of 1

More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:41 pm
by Kaiser Mors VI
Right now a Duke is called a 'Noble' which is a form of 'Noble'. The Kaiser is a Supreme Noble and Barons(etc) are Lesser-Nobles.

I think we should replace all references to Dukes with 'Full-Noble' as we did with Barons being replaced with Lesser-Noble.

Basically, I think we should make more clear that Noble is an overarching term, referring to 3 ranks of Nobility. Supreme-Noble, Full-Noble and Lesser-Noble.

Once the current round of bills get tucked away, I'll put forward some precise language. But figured I'd bring it up for conversation.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:43 pm
by Daniel Farewell
That is how I would have envisioned it, too. But I don't like the names. Let's see if we can work up some other names?

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:45 pm
by Kaiser Mors VI
It is possible names could be redone soon. But this is just to help us in that direction. We need to make the layers clear.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:47 pm
by Daniel Farewell
Or we make it all rigid and call them all nobles, the full ones dukes/duchesses, the lesser one barons/baronesses, just like tradition had it :)

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:47 pm
by Daniel Farewell
But the three-tier system is good. We ought to keep that.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:50 pm
by Kaiser Mors VI
We alway had a 3 tier system. I just want to set it up in more generic terms. I would be pleased to see more titles created on the level of Full-Noble. But perhaps with more complex variety.

Dukes have land and votes, which can both be inherited. Thus we have 3 variables that, at this level of rank, we keep grouped. We could, if it pleased us, create more complicated combination.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:58 pm
by CJ Miller
Instead of dukes/barons/counts, maybe have viceroys/dukes/earls or dukes/marquis/earls.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:30 pm
by Kaiser Mors VI
That's just juggling titles. I desire more then just juggling names, yet leaving the entire structure the same.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 am
by Ryan
Some suggestions:

High Noble and Low Noble

Major Noble and Minor Noble

Senior Noble and Junior Noble

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:02 am
by Aurangzeb Khan
Kaiser = Kaiser, surely? No need to invent a new term for what is already a category of one.
Dukes = Nobles Patrician (The noble who sits at the apex of local government)
Barons = Nobles Equestrian (An equestrian class, well in the past they would have needed a horse to travel round their accumulated counties...)
Counts/Earls/Sanctmasters/Brothelkeepers = Nobles Civitas (The bottom of the pile, administering and interfacing with the actual simulated locations, the lowest engine for the generating of cultural works, however dull and insipid - Kanto - those might actually be.)

Render those suggestions into your Shirerithian conlang which is languishing out there somewhere and you are done.

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:47 am
by Daniel Farewell
All hail Ardy!

Re: More nobility Clarity

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:44 pm
by Kaiser Mors VI
hmmmm.. I like his ideas.