The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Rai Avon-El · Post by **Rai Avon-El** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 1:59 am

Your Graces, Imperial Nobles of the Republic,

The Kaiser hasn't given our Empire any sign of life for over eight days. At the same time we have no steward to rule in the meantime.

This situation is dangerous. I am sure you all agree with me. I would therefore humbly ask you to elect a steward to rule in the Kaiser's unfortunate absence.

Count Farewell.

Kaiser Erasmas I · Post by **Kaiser Erasmas I** » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:14 am

While I am still here, and I do humbly apologize for the unexpected absence, I'd like for the Landsraad to go ahead with the election of the Steward. The spot is vacant, after all, which leaves us in a rather unpleasant situation if something truly *were* to happen to me.

Post by **Jacobus Loki** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:18 pm

This situation is dangerous. I am sure you all agree with me. I would therefore humbly ask you to elect a steward to rule in the Kaiser's unfortunate absence.

DAM....DAM......DAM......

perfect opportunity for a Coup and I missed it.......

Leo Fenrir · Post by **Leo Fenrir** » Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:37 pm

Good point.

VOTE FOR A STEWARD

And by 'A' I mean me...

Iskander Mirkdale · Post by **Iskander Mirkdale** » Sat May 02, 2009 7:33 am

And then perhaps a Deputy Steward (just to be extra safe)?

Allot · Post by **Allot** » Sat May 02, 2009 7:34 am

Why doesn't the Steward appoint a Deputy Steward?

Leo Fenrir · Post by **Leo Fenrir** » Sat May 02, 2009 5:16 pm

While we are at it we should elect a Deputy Allot, for those moments when we really need him.

Allot · Post by **Allot** » Sat May 02, 2009 5:17 pm

Ow, and bugger off.

Leo Fenrir · Post by **Leo Fenrir** » Sat May 02, 2009 5:24 pm

That was meant to be heartfelt.

Post by **Jacobus Loki** » Mon May 04, 2009 1:16 pm

Deputy Vice Assistant Steward...

Austi_Scot · Post by **Austi_Scot** » Sun May 17, 2009 4:16 am

And then perhaps a Deputy Steward (just to be extra safe)?

Elect me as Deputy Steward. A useful title I do believe.

Leo Fenrir · Post by **Leo Fenrir** » Sun May 17, 2009 9:05 am

Back off mister.

Austi_Scot · Post by **Austi_Scot** » Sun May 17, 2009 4:26 pm

Why you ask - a step back - in order to gain two forward.

Malliki · Post by **Malliki** » Sun May 17, 2009 6:07 pm

There is no law allowing us to elect a deputy Steward, nor is there any precedent that I am aware of. If the Steward were to go inactive though, there is nothing preventing us from electing a new one.

Iskander Mirkdale · Post by **Iskander Mirkdale** » Mon May 18, 2009 10:43 am

Is there any law that prohibits the election of a Deputy Steward?

Post by **Jacobus Loki** » Mon May 18, 2009 11:11 am

A-

The Kaiser is still AOL (or is he Google?)

B-

The Steward can bloody well do what he likes in the absence of the Kaiser.

C-

Precedant exisits for Dual Stewards.

D-

Leo isn't going to do it.

E-

The Landsraad could, but polly won't.

F-

time for a revival of the shadow gov't?

Allot · Post by **Allot** » Mon May 18, 2009 11:48 am

Iskander Mirkdale wrote:Is there any law that prohibits the election of a Deputy Steward?

No, but I think that for such a powerful position legislation would be needed to regulate said position.

Post by **Jacobus Loki** » Mon May 18, 2009 11:55 am

pffft.

"The Kaiser or the Steward may appoint a Depty Steward.

In the absence of the Steward, the Deputy Steward shall serve as Steward."

In the style of Loki III.

That will be 200 erb.

Austi_Scot · Post by **Austi_Scot** » Tue May 26, 2009 5:12 pm

Well then, I say appoint me as Deputy Steward. A useful title I do believe.
That is unless the Steward position is now available!

I'll be back in full in a week or two and ready for the position.

Kaiseress Anandja I · Post by **Kaiseress Anandja I** » Tue May 26, 2009 9:01 pm

I think the issue is rather moot since I'm not AWOL.

Bacchus · Post by **Bacchus** » Wed May 27, 2009 6:55 am

Kaiseress Anandja I wrote:I think the issue is rather moot since I'm not AWOL.

Finally, someone speaks sense! And I'm glad it's the Kaiseress who does so actually, a very good sign.

The issue of who is to be Steward or Deputy Steward I find humourously preemptive. I've always felt the role of Steward has been a peculiar one, and I think zir appointment should be restricted to a) when the Kaiser(ess) announces a LOA or b) the Landsraad thinks one should be appointed, e.g. after the Kaiser's gone MIA for a week. However, that's just my two cents.

Kaiseress Anandja I · Post by **Kaiseress Anandja I** » Wed May 27, 2009 9:13 am

I like to have a Steward all the time. I could lose internet connection at any time, then it's better to have a permanent Steward.

Post by **Jacobus Loki** » Wed May 27, 2009 1:24 pm

Yeah, like she said......

Austi is catching up.....

Austi_Scot · Post by **Austi_Scot** » Wed May 27, 2009 4:16 pm

A most fruitfull discussion I do believe.

Shireroth

The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Re: The absence of the Kaiser and a Steward

Who is online