![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
I think the best is to have a currency with an equal value, it's simple and avoids never-ending discussions about the exhange rate. We don't use one currency, we use different currencies with the same value.
Moderator: Kaiser Fish XII
It's indeed the same thing as a unified currency, but I hope will use a central bank to make things easy.Erik Mortis wrote:Isn't that the same thing as a unified currency? We just don't have the convenience of a central bank?
I want an account in Shireroth and one in Batavia. So I can avoid that the Batavian money doesn't effect the power of Kildare in Landsraad.Also, prohibit people from having multiple accounts, thus you have to register to 1 nation if you are a duel cit. If you want to be counted in a Shireroth duchy vote count you have to have your account registered to Shireroth, and thus can't move the money from one account to another. Also, nations can only tax accounts registered to their nation. If a nation moves money to influence a vote in our nation, we have law that allows us to confiscate the money. And, the amounts that would have to be moved to make a noticeable change would be inherently noticeable.
I know you hate the idea of anyone having citizenship outside of Shireroth Erik, but does that mean you're gonna punish those who do - even if they're citizen of a nation we're having an ECONOMIC UNION with?!Erik Mortis wrote:Also, prohibit people from having multiple accounts, thus you have to register to 1 nation if you are a duel cit. If you want to be counted in a Shireroth duchy vote count you have to have your account registered to Shireroth, and thus can't move the money from one account to another. Also, nations can only tax accounts registered to their nation. If a nation moves money to influence a vote in our nation, we have law that allows us to confiscate the money. And, the amounts that would have to be moved to make a noticeable change would be inherently noticeable.
But equal-value currency is just currency with automatic exchange at a 1:1 rateJonas wrote:I think the best is to have a currency with an equal value, it's simple and avoids never-ending discussions about the exhange rate. We don't use one currency, we use different currencies with the same value.
It is in a way, but recognition of the Kaiser as Head of the State is impossible (for now). He never visited us and can't even speak Dutch.b3n|<3r|\| wrote:I'm just a Count, but I don't Shireroth is really interested in a YAMO or economic union. I thought this economic business was an extension of our Commonwealth with Batavia. And I was still hoping you'd recognise the Kaiser as Super-Duper-FigureHead of State.
You forget that I'm not the only Batavian, that a lot of Batavians don't know Batavia very well (that's why I want this commonwealth) and that we are speaking about a Dutch micronation. Dutch micronationalists are mostly serious and not as nuts as I amb3n|<3r|\| wrote:Batavia can have its own King or President or other Head of State, I would have you recognise him as a new position that means nothing.![]()
But I don't mind if you don't wanna, that's fine. But I don't really like the idea of Shireroth entering an organisation or union like this without it being within a "greater Shireroth" type thing.
... and most Dutch micronationalists don't like colonies tooErik Mortis wrote:"He never visited us and can't even speak Dutch. " Never stopped Queen Victory becoming Empress of India..
That didn't stopped us to get our own colonies.I think we can blame the Spanish for that?
Because it was tried in the Dutch sector. An organisation which organised transactions (and still does), but it goes slow because it isn't automated. A central bank can make it possible to send money to others in other nations without loosing much time.Bayen wrote:How do you know private companies will fail? >_> They seem like the best idea... and if not that, then even individual trading...
And Toketi has non-elected nobles and a non-elected head of state. We're not evil!
That sounds like the organization's fault, not the idea's. If, for example, some Aussies teamed up with some Americans, they could have people online almost all the time, and with good email notifications going on, transactions could go pretty fast. And there's always competition - if the company that's working now is doing badly, you can take over the market by establishing your own! (Remember, you run for a profit margin, so it's in your interest to keep customers.)Jonas wrote:Because it was tried in the Dutch sector. An organisation which organised transactions (and still does), but it goes slow because it isn't automated. A central bank can make it possible to send money to others in other nations without loosing much time.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests