Voting quotas

Locked
User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

I started a new thread for this. The treaties have to be cleaned up when it comes to voting quotas. This part for example doesn't make much sense:
2. Nations wishing to join the commonwealth must be approved by the Commonwealth Assembly with at least a 1/3rd plurality. If rejected, a nation may reapply in 3 months.
Could the person that wrote that (Erik?) please explain what it means, and then maybe we can write it in an unambiguous way.

Same goes for:
A simple majority (50%+1)
A simple majority is not the same thing as 50%+1.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

User avatar
phineas elastopon
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by phineas elastopon »

Malliki Tosha wrote:Same goes for:
A simple majority (50%+1)
A simple majority is not the same thing as 50%+1.
They must mean an absolute majority. It could be a simple majority of 50%+1 if there were only two options, but, of course, there's always abstain. ;)
Phineas Elastopon (formerly known as Benkern, Bacchus etc.)
Republic of Antica
Inquisitor

User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

50%+1 is a bad description. Simple or absolute majority are far better descriptions. Say you have 7 votes. What is the required number of Ayes to pass if the description is 50%+1? It could be 7/2 = 3.5+1 = 4.5 = 5, when the correct answer is 4.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Erik Mortis »

Well the 1/3rd thing had a reason I explained in the other thread. Do you just wanna know what I meant numerically by 1/3rd? 1/3rd of votes must be Aye. I prefer to ignore Abstains for votes. So if we got 10 voters. 3 Aye, 6 Nay and 1 abstain. 1/3rd is met.

Guess I'm just used to 50%+1 being clear(We used it a lot in the old days...). It means Greater then 50%, so 50.000001% would be over. So I guess we can just rephrase it to "Greater then 50%" So if we have 10 voters. No abstain. 6 must be Aye. If we have 1 abstain 5 must be Aye.

User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

Don't you think that it would cause unnecessary conflicts within the SC if a minority can overrule the majority?

I think "simple majority" should be used.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

Erik Mortis
Posts: 7238
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2003 10:37 pm
Location: County of Monty Crisco
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Erik Mortis »

I only support using 1/3rd for admittance. ALL other cases I agree 100% with you.

Word it how you wish. It's just a technical issue, not a philosophical one.

User avatar
Maximilian
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Maximilian »

The official Batavian opinion is that we should switch to 1/2 of the votes casted instead of 1/3 of the votes casted when a nation applies for membership. (I'm not really in a position to debate on this, since it is not my personal opinion.)
Maximilian van Bunthe-Uné
High Representative of the Kingdom of Batavia to the Small Commonwealth

User avatar
Chrimigules
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Ano, Kaikias, Antica
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Chrimigules »

Could change the numerical explanation to +50% or >50% or something along those lines.
Image

User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

There is no need for a numerical explanation.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

User avatar
Chrimigules
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Ano, Kaikias, Antica
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Chrimigules »

Well, for anyone who doesn't know what a simple majority is, it's helpful for them to have it defined on the spot.
Image

User avatar
phineas elastopon
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by phineas elastopon »

Chrimigules wrote:Well, for anyone who doesn't know what a simple majority is, it's helpful for them to have it defined on the spot.
And given the confusion in the original treaty, it seems quite necessary.
Phineas Elastopon (formerly known as Benkern, Bacchus etc.)
Republic of Antica
Inquisitor

User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

For anyone who doesn't know what a simple majority is, I recommend Wikipedia.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

User avatar
Chrimigules
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Ano, Kaikias, Antica
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Chrimigules »

Perhaps, but it's usually considered proper for such documents to define and spell out explicitly things that may not be understood as is. :smashy A lot of legal documents are filled with definitions.
Image

User avatar
Malliki Tosha
Posts: 2516
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:43 am

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Malliki Tosha »

The definition is "simple majority". If you don't know what a "majority" is, you probably can't read the treaty to begin with.
Malliki Tosha
Owner, Mortis Mercatoria FC
Owner, Newport City FC

User avatar
Andreas the Wise
Posts: 5253
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
Contact:

Re: Voting quotas

Post by Andreas the Wise »

Malliki Tosha wrote:For anyone who doesn't know what a simple majority is, I recommend Wikipedia.
Oddly enough, it suggests two definitions which, while equivalent for all votes involving only two options, differs in meaning if we ever conduct a vote more complex than "Approve" or "Deny", and doesn't explicitly address how Abstains are counted.

So I'd suggest that the treaty clearly state that Abstains are not counted towards the total votes in determining a percentage.
And I'd think that >50% is more helpful than 'simple majority', because as wikipedia has pointed out, apparently Americans define Simple Majority as >50%, where as I would think of it as 'the option with the most votes' and think of 50%+1 as 'absolute majority'. Numbers are clear, while words are not always so.
The character Andreas the Wise is on indefinite leave.
However, this account still manages:
Cla'Udi - Count of Melangia
Manuel - CEO of VBNC. For all you'll ever need.
Vincent Waldgrave - Lord General of Gralus
Q - Director of SAMIN
Duke Mel'Kat - Air Pirate, Melangian, and Duke of the Flying Duchy of Glanurchy

And references may be made to Vur'Alm Xei'Bôn (a Nelagan Micron of undisclosed purpose).

Locked

Return to “Summit At The Tree”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests