Shireroth

Posted: **Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:51 pm**

Commonwealth Member
The Republic of Ashkenatza (Szhmuel Astopov)
Batavië (Maximilian)
Hurmu (Arviður)
The Kingdom of Livlandia (Artz)
Bovic Empire of Natopia (Nathan of Natopia)
Republiek der Nederlanden(Nihill Romez)
Nelaga Territories (Harvey Steffke)
Gralus (Andreas the Wise)
Imperial Republic of Shireroth (Erik Mortis)
Viking Empire of Stormark (Björn Ironfist)

Non-Commonwealth Members
Alexandria
Antica
United States of the Sangunese Crown
Valencia
Victoria

The Jurists of the Commonwealth Court.
The Secundus of the General Assembly.

Posted: **Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:51 pm**

Are there any suggestions for other non-members to invite? Or other non-members who come by here and might like to attend.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:44 am**

I would like something clarified, please. While I notice that the nations are listed, with the representative's name aside, I wanted to know if we had to request additions to those names; is anyone from Stormark allowed, or should I request they be added? The reason I ask is that, since part of the agenda includes discussions about the Court, and I am no jurist, I would want Dame Gudrun to attend to that.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:05 am**

Yes. I simply grabbed the list form the thread in the main SC forum. The Jurists would be invited specifically. As for a general allowance for people to speak, I suppose that's up for discussion. I have no opposition to it.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:44 am**

I suppose we could handle speaking this way:

The representative who is listed for each nation may invite someone to speak for them. So I would ask that the floor recognise so-and-so from Stormark to speak for us, and that person would have the ability to voice his/her opinions, etc. This would also help in keeping things a bit easier to follow for those of us (and I am talking about ME here) who aren't quite as clever as the rest of you.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:52 am**

That sounds like a good idea. Something like this can all too easy drown in unnecessary posts about irrelevant issues. I will try to limit myself to issues regarding the Court and other legal issues. It would feel out-of-place for me to discuss the future and scope of the SC.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:26 pm**

Malliki Tosha wrote:That sounds like a good idea. Something like this can all too easy drown in unnecessary posts about irrelevant issues. I will try to limit myself to issues regarding the Court and other legal issues. It would feel out-of-place for me to discuss the future and scope of the SC.

What makes you say that, mate? We all have something to contribute!!

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:28 pm**

Björn Ironfist wrote:I suppose we could handle speaking this way:

The representative who is listed for each nation may invite someone to speak for them. So I would ask that the floor recognise so-and-so from Stormark to speak for us, and that person would have the ability to voice his/her opinions, etc. This would also help in keeping things a bit easier to follow for those of us (and I am talking about ME here) who aren't quite as clever as the rest of you.

I'm not sure why you continually degrade yourself. You seem quite clever enough to me. As case in point, this idea of yours is a really good suggestion and it has my approval.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:28 pm**

I agree with Harvey. You aren't dull or such.

Posted: **Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:37 pm**

Björn Ironfist wrote:
Malliki Tosha wrote:That sounds like a good idea. Something like this can all too easy drown in unnecessary posts about irrelevant issues. I will try to limit myself to issues regarding the Court and other legal issues. It would feel out-of-place for me to discuss the future and scope of the SC.
What makes you say that, mate? We all have something to contribute!!

Yes, but I feel that it is better left for the national representatives to discuss the overall future of the SC. I will try to focus on the Court.

And I agree with Harvey, stop beating yourself down. You're a Viking for Gods' sake!

Posted: **Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:49 am**

Malliki Tosha wrote:
Björn Ironfist wrote:
Malliki Tosha wrote:That sounds like a good idea. Something like this can all too easy drown in unnecessary posts about irrelevant issues. I will try to limit myself to issues regarding the Court and other legal issues. It would feel out-of-place for me to discuss the future and scope of the SC.
What makes you say that, mate? We all have something to contribute!!
Yes, but I feel that it is better left for the national representatives to discuss the overall future of the SC. I will try to focus on the Court.

And I agree with Harvey, stop beating yourself down. You're a Viking for Gods' sake!

Name ONE Viking who was renowned for his intellect, and not his ability to hack ass with a battleaxe.

Posted: **Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:05 am**

King Canute.

Posted: **Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:15 am**

Touche. He was still better known for being a badass though:

Knut, Svein, and the Viking army crushed Ethelred, who by definition was unready for the asskicking he so generously received, and when King Svein died a few years later Knut took over as the all-powerful ruler of England. Ethelred’s son Edmund Ironside got his panties in a wad about the whole thing and tried to re-take the throne from the Danish berserker, but Knut dragon-punched that jerkwad so hard that his decapitated head sailed across the channel, passed forward in time a few hundred years, and landed eye-first on the Eiffel Tower. Then he married the guy’s widow just to rub it in.

Posted: **Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:21 am**

I would say he was an evil bastard (all successful monarchs were back then) but he's better known to posterity as a rational statesman who held together a vast North Sea empire, and also was said to have done that stunt rebuking his flatterers by proving he did not exercise dominion over the sea by the expedient of getting his feet wet.

Knut dragon-punched that jerkwad so hard that his decapitated head sailed across the channel, passed forward in time a few hundred years, and landed eye-first on the Eiffel Tower

A slightly anachronistic summary...

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:09 am**

On topic please?

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:32 am**

Sorry for getting off-track. Please accept my apology.

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:34 am**

No worries.

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:13 am**

I would like us to consider inviting Valencia, as well. They are young yet, but I feel they could have a promising future, with proper aid. Couldn't hurt to help them develop, etc if possible.

Valencian Forum:

http://langelski.site11.com/Forum/phpBB3/index.php

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:02 am**

Hurmu would like to invite the United States of the Sangunese Crown to this Congress.

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:35 am**

Added to the list. When the time comes would you two be so kinda as to contract those two nations, as I'm not familiar with them, and you seem to be.

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:15 pm**

I will.

Posted: **Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:42 pm**

Erik Mortis wrote:Added to the list. When the time comes would you two be so kinda as to contract those two nations, as I'm not familiar with them, and you seem to be.

Sure thing

Posted: **Sat Dec 26, 2009 1:25 pm**

I would like to invite mr. Gert Geens to the congress. Gert Geens is a Batavian since half a year or so. The important thing is that he is a micronationalist since 1997, was the founder of the Virtual Republic of Flanders and was president or chancellor in the Virtual Republic for a long time.

Posted: **Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:21 pm**

Umm. Nothing really keeps him from showing up.

Posted: **Sun Dec 27, 2009 4:08 am**

Good

Posted: **Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:11 am**

Perhaps a few reps from the MCS could be invited?

Posted: **Sun Dec 27, 2009 7:57 pm**

Why? I see no reason to involve a non-national organization. Especially one that is, in theory, neutral.

Shireroth

Invite List.

Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.

Re: Invite List.