The Marquess of Shirekeep

Arviður · Post by **Arviður** » Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:07 am

Shouldn't we change the name of this title?

It doesn't feel right to call it such.

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:10 am

It is just to aknowledge the historical connection between Shirekeep and Brookshire.

Kaiser Leto III · Post by **Kaiser Leto III** » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:15 am

Malliki Tosha wrote:It is just to aknowledge the historical connection between Shirekeep and Brookshire.

Meh, you're right about that one. No problems from my side.

Arviður · Post by **Arviður** » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:17 am

I had an uneasy feel about it, but there seems to be no problems with it.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Fri Dec 25, 2009 11:26 pm

Shirekeep shall be mine!

Kaiser Leto III · Post by **Kaiser Leto III** » Sat Dec 26, 2009 3:49 am

Erik Mortis wrote:Shirekeep shall be mine!

In your dreams, yes.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:40 am

In reality, I shall take that city, someday.

Arviður · Post by **Arviður** » Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:58 am

Geographically it should belong to Elwynn, politically it should be seperate, and nostalgically Brookshirian.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:23 pm

Historically it should be Brookshire. Fuck Geography. According to Geography Musica should belong to Brookshire, but last I knew Yardistan held it. Good for them.

Shireroth

The Marquess of Shirekeep

The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Re: The Marquess of Shirekeep

Who is online