Commonwealth Court Convention

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:56 am

We should also make sure we have jurists from DIFFERENT nations.

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:10 am

Yeah. I'm a candidate as everyone should know by now.

Aster · Post by **Aster** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:09 am

My government would be strongly against any such component being instated within the Small Commonwealth. We are interested in it as an economic organisation and a way to strengthen our relationships with its member states - we will not have any quarter with any citizens being subdued to any court which is not Pan-Micran or Ashkenatzi.

...don't shoot the messenger...

Post by **Jonas** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:10 am

You aren't forced to join the treaty.

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:18 am

Aster wrote:My government would be strongly against any such component being instated within the Small Commonwealth. We are interested in it as an economic organisation and a way to strengthen our relationships with its member states - we will not have any quarter with any citizens being subdued to any court which is not Pan-Micran or Ashkenatzi.

...don't shoot the messenger...

Are you, by chance, Antican as well? Starting to sound like it.

As Jonas says, there is no requirement to join the Court Convention. If Ashkenatza wishes to stay out of the Court, you are most welcome to do so. The Court will have no jurisdiction over Ashkenatza in that case. I suggest you read the treaties and conventions before you draw premature conclusions.

Aster · Post by **Aster** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:46 pm

No need to become so hostile, Herr Tosha!

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:51 pm

Likewise, Mr. Aster.

You need to read the treaties before you get all antsy.

Aster · Post by **Aster** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:02 pm

Further discussions have been initiated in Kolmenitsky, but I doubt that the outcome will be a YEA. However, it is an intriguing proposition.

Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:17 pm

Well, the rather interesting idea about this court is that nations have agreed to it (as opposed to all the other attempts to set up a UN sort of court) and have something more than just the court holding them together ... so I think it'll actually work (unlike the last however many YAMO courts). Or at least function tolerably for as long as the SC lasts.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:07 pm

It's already got two nations signed on.

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:13 pm

Two more on the way, at least.

Björn Ironfist · Post by **Björn Ironfist** » Tue Nov 10, 2009 3:03 am

Stormark's legislature has passed this (5-0-2). Since the Emperor was one who voted in favor, I can safely assume he will provide his Imperial Assent. So we can officially count Stormark on board.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:38 am

Well, I'll add you to the list once you've updated your thread in the repository.

Malliki Tosha · Post by **Malliki Tosha** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:06 am

We now have five signatory nations to this treaty (Shireroth, Stormark, Hurmu, Nelaga and Amokolia). Are we going to get this moving or what?

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:21 pm

I guess so.

Post by **Jonas** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:23 pm

Batavia has also signed it (our representative is waiting for the signature of the King).

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:26 pm

Well, let us know when it is formalized.

Maximilian · Post by **Maximilian** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:16 pm

We will

Shireroth

Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Re: Commonwealth Court Convention

Who is online