*mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule*

Harvey Steffke · Post by **Harvey Steffke** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:34 pm

(but notice that this mumbling is entirely incoherent, as per the rule.)

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:28 pm

Suggestions?

Harvey Steffke · Post by **Harvey Steffke** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:34 pm

Make it so that only one can be a representative for voting purposes, but any number of citizens from member nations can come to debate.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:37 pm

Aren't you a rep?

Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:39 pm

Jonas became Rep, I believe. Though if he's rep for Batavia ... Harvey should still be rep for Nelaga ...

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:36 pm

Batavië (Mateo Mattiassen)
Livlandia (Artz)
Natopia (Nathan of Natopia)
Nelaga Territories (President Harvey
Gralus (Andreas the Wise)
Shireroth (Erik Mortis)
Stormark (Harald of Froyalan)

My rep records. Though I admit they got deleted and I had to redo them, and sometimes I don't get the update.

Post by **Jonas** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 7:40 am

I'm rep for Nelaga.
I prefer the idea of letting everyone debate about the matter and eventually one representative vote. Or a forum where we talk and one where we vote.

Harvey Steffke · Post by **Harvey Steffke** » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:32 pm

Nelaga's policy is that the President is the diplomatic image of the nation and handles any sort of major diplomatic affairs, including being SC rep. I would have figured he would have told you when he took over. My apologies for the lack of information.

In any event, my issue stands, and I do agree with Jonas on the solution.

Nathan of Natopia · Post by **Nathan of Natopia** » Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:37 pm

I think Jonas' idea is a good idea as well.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:12 pm

Well, then I'll leave the Assembly as it is now. But won't make a deal if people speak as they wish anywhere else.

Post by **Jonas** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:49 pm

The Nederlanden are voting about joining the SC... Nihill Romez will act as their representative.

Maximilian · Post by **Maximilian** » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:55 am

That's right. Furthermore the Lagerhuis has almost decided that I should be the representative for Batavia. Hurray!

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:19 pm

Just keep me posted so I can update the records.

Maximilian · Post by **Maximilian** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:34 pm

The King has just made me the official representative of the Kingdom of Batavia. That's sort of what I wanna announce.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:19 pm

okey. I'll update the list, and I've asked for the posting restrictions to be removed. So I'll just maintain the assembly without having the forum block people. This will allow non-reps to say stuff, but not vote.

Harvey Steffke · Post by **Harvey Steffke** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:34 am

Much appreciated.

Harvey Steffke · Post by **Harvey Steffke** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:35 pm

Since this is sort of a "hey, I'm a rep now!" thread... um, hey, I'm a rep now. Jonas has resigned the Presidency and Acting President Andreas has assigned me the position.

Post by **Jonas** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:02 am

Harvey Steffke wrote:Since this is sort of a "hey, I'm a rep now!" thread... um, hey, I'm a rep now. Jonas has resigned the Presidency and Acting President Andreas has assigned me the position.

The change of the guard.

Post by **Erik Mortis** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 11:43 am

Noted.

Shireroth

mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Re: mumbles incoherently about the one-representative rule

Who is online