Consideration of the Actions of the Count of Hyperborea
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:30 am
It is apparent that Scott, Count of Hyperborea, did instigate a rebellion against our person as the legitimately appointed Duke of Elwynn. Such rebellions are permitted by the law, providing that they have our consent. On this occasion, consent was neither sought nor granted, so the rebellion was prohibited by the law.
It is our opinion that Count Scott should apologise to this Council for his actions and pay homage as described in Decree XXIII. It is further our opinion that the extinguishmemt of his former position of Baron of Kai-Raikoth during the rebellion constitutes a fair and equitable penalty for instigating a prohibited rebellion and that then this matter shall be considered closed.
Is this also the opinion of this Council?
It is our opinion that Count Scott should apologise to this Council for his actions and pay homage as described in Decree XXIII. It is further our opinion that the extinguishmemt of his former position of Baron of Kai-Raikoth during the rebellion constitutes a fair and equitable penalty for instigating a prohibited rebellion and that then this matter shall be considered closed.
Is this also the opinion of this Council?