Your argument is that the Duke can promote people he likes, therefore they may support him should the rest of Elwynn decide to depose him? That is their choice to do so. As I said before, we must decide who is eligible to vote before deciding a suitable majority for impeachment.
The way I see it, that argument is invalid, and I critiqued it:Leo wrote:The way I see it for this law to be effective there must be room for the probability of what Scott has said, that the Duke would have put a friend in a position of power Beforehand, could happen
There is no logical way to prevent a Duke from promoting friends, and it is not given to you nor to any member of this Council to decide who is eligible to become a Baron and who is not. This Duchy will not become an oligarchy under me. It is between the Barons to discuss whether or not they feel a Duke is performing poorly, and if so, inform him. On another note, I am continually bemused by your inference that merely because people are friends they will collaborate together (I would point you to this discussion as evidence). I feel you are losing sight of the main purpose of this proposal: to prevent an inactive Duke from strangling activity SHOULD such an emergency occur. I will not see the Ducal powers limited in any other way for THIS proposal. We can discuss that elsewhere.Allot wrote:A law cannot be based upon the mere if scenario that a Duke could appoint someone before hand.
As to your other point, made later, I will repeat myself: In order to solve the voting majority problem, we must first decide WHO is eligible to vote.