Shireroth

IC III(A)(a):

Quote:
The Arbiter of Shireroth is vested with judicial powers second only to the Kaiser.


IC III(A)(d):

Quote:
The Arbiter will be the head of the Imperial Judex.


ICoL V(A)(1)(a):

Quote:
The Judex is the system of Courts within the nation of Shireroth.

That's very nice, but ...

But you haven't established jurisdiction.

That's a bit of a difficult argument to sustain considering that probably 90% of the population are to the left of me and Ardy.

Say that when you've been assaulted by people who still circulate those caricatures.

I did away the reference to Jews

No you didn't. It is a physical caricature, so you'd have to completely redraw the image.

Do you know what taste is?

I've got about 20 Raymond E. Feists...

Yes I think we all noticed that in your wholescale "importing" of the series into your micronation.

If they're not Babkhan, they're not innocent.

Continued problems with anti-spam bot software. It's happened to a couple of other people as well.

The MNS terms of service are self-contradictory. It uses a system to provide gold stars to news sources based (effectively) on how close they emulate KZFO, and then in almost the same breath states that it is "impartial" and "non-judgemental".

I'm writing with no particular hat on. The matter is closed on MNN because it can be discussed elsewhere and Nick was not willing to be respectful over the issue.

Actually it's simpler than that: KZFO and MWG violated the Terms of Service of the MNN feed, and rather than admitting he's at fault, he used arguments that do not apply in the jurisdiction MNN is under.

Stop dressing this up to be a freedom of speech issue: it's a simple case of legal liability.

Actually by linking to them we are liable:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/29/no_master_criminal/


I'm growing tired of explaining this same argument again

We can all see your argument, but it's completely bogus. You're just sticking your fingers in your ears and trawling out the same line ...

Yes, yes it is. You're asking a newspaper, an entity that represents the opinions of a group of people about news and happenings, to censor itself in order to please external sources. No sir, I won't do it.

Get your head out of your arse. You wrote an article about yourself doing something. That ...

As for you, FarzAn, are you seriously trying to use the argument that a show that blatantly violates copyright law every episode (INS SS, Radio Free Woodstania), can make the statement that their content should be more respected than the content they pirate every single episode?

This isn't to do ...

The one that I quoted earlier. Perhaps rather than ranting, a little reading would be in order. MNN gets to decide because we don't harbour the pretension that we're above the law. The posts violate the MNN feed Terms of Service, given that they render us potentially legally liable for promoting ...

Can you blame a man for taking pleasure in creating sweet, sweet activity-boosting problems?

So you're just doing this for the hell of it, regardless of the fact that you're libelling people in the process?

How did The Micronational Wulaptonachgat violate the Terms of Service? Its removal from ...

Stop fibbing. You're continuing to insult the INS and MNN administrators and threatening boycotts and DoS attacks, and you haven't removed the offending posts from the MWG.

There's a much simpler solution:

1. Remove or amend the posts on KZFO, MWG and AL about piracy, as these are why they've been de-listed (they're an admission of ToS violations and render MNN liable over any KZFO copyright violations, real or perceived). Remove these, and MNN will be able to ...

I'm speaking for myself here, but I am (for those who don't know), a member of the INS Board and an administrator of MNN.

There are three key issues here, and it is worth not blurring the lines between them, as they are largely distinct albeit connected.

1. MWG and KZFO were delisted for admitting ...