Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
It's good, but why two and not one? One is surely enough? Richard LyonYansha Elaer Kyon gef ShanPernem kahn gef kuymal per varga stiPernem kahn gef varga per kuymal sti
- Fax Celestis
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 6:42 pm
- Location: County of Naudia'Diva
- Contact:
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Hey, it's always been two. Viatax Sitadi Axdivijink Regigoraauk
-
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:35 pm
- Location: My Airship
- Contact:
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Yardistan Aye(7), although this is really more of a common sense thing than anything. They call it a signature, but no one ever signs their posts...
- Fax Celestis
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 6:42 pm
- Location: County of Naudia'Diva
- Contact:
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Greater Brookshire votes AYE (6), because it's the principle of the thing. Viatax Sitadi Axdivijink Regigoraauk
- Fax Celestis
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2002 6:42 pm
- Location: County of Naudia'Diva
- Contact:
Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Changes the Procedures of the Landsraad, Article III, Clause 2 from:Quote:Clause 2. In the event of a tied vote in the Landsraad, where all nobles have voted, and where the full voting time for the vote has been extended, the Praetor may be granted two additional votes to break the vote, in the interest of law and order in the Imperial Republic.To:Quote:Clause 2. In the event of a tied vote in the Landsraad, where all nobles have voted, and where the full voting time for the vote has been extended, the Praetor may be granted two additional votes to break the vote, in the interest of law and order in the Imperial Republic. These two votes must be cast as a Yea or a Nay vote, and may not be cast as Abstains. Viatax Sitadi Axdivijink Regigoraauk
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Elwynn-Lac Glacei - Aye (2) Richard LyonYansha Elaer Kyon gef ShanPernem kahn gef kuymal per varga stiPernem kahn gef varga per kuymal sti
- AngelGuardian93
- Posts: 2583
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 8:36 pm
- Location: Russell Castle, Mirioth
- Contact:
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
BAM votes aye (3). There are no flowers, no not this time. There will be no angels gracing the lines, just these stark words I find.
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
Naudia'Diva votes AYE (2)
- Hypatia Agnesi
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:06 am
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Re: Praetor's Odd Loophole Amendment
This bill has PASSED.Aye: 20Nay: 0Abstain: 0 *throws grenade for the hell of it*BO0O0O0O0/\/\!!!!!!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests