AMO (II) Plaintiff vs Baron Jess Heimer Defendant

[Erik Mortis]

On behalf of the Inquisitor, and to give the benefit of the doubt, I request the extension on his behalf. He may simply not have had the chance to respond. I ask for up to 24 more hours.

[Malliki]

The Imperial Inquisitor has visited this board on multiple occasions during those 24 hours, as well as posted on other topics. An extension could have easily been requested by a single, one sentence post.

[Aurangzeb Khan]

Edit: Earlier "testy" comment retracted.

I apologise for my failure to respond to the court with an update as to my intentions. The court however may find as it sees fit as it shall have no bearing on the resumption of the petition.

[Erik Mortis]

Oh. It will. It will.

[Aurangzeb Khan]

Are you Kaiser? I cannot and will not.

Edit: I naturally retract that.

[Malliki]

Take this outside this thread. I will not hesitate to find you in contempt of court if this disrespectful behavior continues.

Edit: Retraction or not, this is not a real time chat. You have a choice to think before you post.

[Malliki]

Trial Findings

Ardashir Moqtada al-Osmani, Imperial Inquisitor
vs.
Lord Jess Heimer, Baron of the Holy Lands

on

Violation of the Tri Citizenship law (LB IX-B)

On other charges
From the beginning, this trial was limited to the possible violation of the Tri Citizenship law. However, there were, and still are, accusations voiced against the defendant for attempting to register a papel. Therefore, this court will briefly address those accusations. While registering a papel might be malicious, it is also not illegal. A person cannot be punished for something that was not a crime at the time the act was committed. It is the opinion of this court that the public ridicule the defendant has had to endure after his papelism attempt is punishment enough.

Summary of evidence
The Inquisitor has attempted to show that the defendant has been a citizen of Shireroth, Gralus, Vanderveer, the Empire of Anterreich-Launderschnell and Mulgaria. While indeed the first four of these citizenships have been proven, it has not been established that the defendant has been a citizen of Mulgaria. Furthermore, the Inquisitor has failed to show which of these citizenships were held at the same time in a satisfactory manner. The defendant has also given a perfectly valid explanation to what citizenships he has had, and the Inquisitor has failed to refute that as well.

Verdict
After careful deliberation and based on the evidence presented before this court, we find the defendant

NOT GUILTY.

Appeal
A Writ of Appeal may be submitted to the Kaiser within seven (7) days of the time stamp of this post.
---
On the parties
I sincerely hope that both parties will behave in a correct and respectful manner if they ever appear before this court again. Both parties have at times behaved in a way not becoming a person before this court and that could, in the future, constitute contempt of court.

[Malliki]

This thread is closed.

[Jonas]

I'm sorry to tell you... but this thread isn't closed...

Congratulations, Jess.