Imperial Decree #213: Praetor

Kaiseress Semisa I · Post by **Kaiseress Semisa I** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:09 pm

Seeing as the Landsraad is currently in a state of disarray and could desperately use a hand; and seeing as Scott of Hyperborea has volunteered for the position; and seeing as the Landsraad couldn't elect a Praetor right now if they wanted to as they have no voting procedure, I hereby appoint Count Scott of Hyperborea to be Praetor to the Landsraad.

By my hand,

Kaiseress Semisa, the Resurrector: First of the Name.

AngelGuardian93 · Post by **AngelGuardian93** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:03 pm

Hurray!

Delphi · Post by **Delphi** » Mon Jan 02, 2006 11:31 pm

Giddyup. Congrats, Scott. Time to show them who's boss!

(Hey, where's the whip smiley?)

Post by **Scott of Hyperborea** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:21 am

Waaait...I didn't volunteer for the position, I just said I'd be willing to help change some titles of bills. You're not even supposed to BE here! And isn't Hypatia the Praetor? And isn't this the second really big job that you've conscripted me into in under three weeks? AAAAAAAH *runs away before the Kaiser can make him Minister of Trade*

Delphi · Post by **Delphi** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 2:12 am

*falls on the floor, laughing hysterically*

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:49 am

James.... nevermind... check precedures, precedents and traditions and you'll see my objections..

Conglacio · Post by **Conglacio** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 4:10 am

Hypatia resigned ages ago

Kiaserial Decree #1: Praetor

I hereby appoint Count Scott of Hyperborea to be Minister of Trade.

By my hand,

Kiaser Conglacio Zorg the Usurpper.

Kaiseress Semisa I · Post by **Kaiseress Semisa I** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:00 am

I'm violating the procedures right now because the Landsraad can't do it for itself. Besides, they exist as per my permission, so in times of need I'd say I'm pretty much entitled to do such a thing.

And no, Hypatia retired when I made the decree stating that the Landsraad was no more.

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:45 pm

James.. this is the 2nd time at least you've violated the charter outright.... This I cannot stand. Has this nations just completely forgotten about law? Seriously... I see violation of all kinds left and right.. and no one brings them to my court..... grrr..

AngelGuardian93 · Post by **AngelGuardian93** » Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:00 pm

Aw man, did he? Well, that's why your in the position your in Erik!

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:49 am

I can't bring people to court... Especially the Kaiser. I have to have a case brought before me.

Kaiseress Semisa I · Post by **Kaiseress Semisa I** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:19 am

I have precedent as well.

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:26 pm

ummm.. when??? and if you quote something I did LONG ago before we had a system of elections, I'll smack you..

osmose1000 · Post by **osmose1000** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:39 pm

I don't think the charter was meant to impeded such specific situations such as this.

Kaiseress Semisa I · Post by **Kaiseress Semisa I** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:50 pm

Imperial Decree #66.

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:08 pm

You quote Harvey's Kaisership..... gah....

Post by **Scott of Hyperborea** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:28 am

Your Niftiness, having successfully completed my goal of clearing out the Landsraad, I petition you to hold an election for Praetor.

Kaiseress Semisa I · Post by **Kaiseress Semisa I** » Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:32 pm

I do believe I shall.

Bill3000 · Post by **Bill3000** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:02 pm

[Phoenix Wright]OBJECTION![/Phoenix Wright]

How did he violate the charter when there is nothing to violate?

The Imperial Charter does not even mention the Praetor.

And in the Procedures of the Landsraad, the appointment for the Praetor is noted as:

The appointment of the Prætor shall comply with the rules for appointment of a Prætor as set down by the Imperial Charter.

But the Praetor's appointment is, once again, not even mentioned in the Charter, as the Praetor is not even in the charter!

Delphi · Post by **Delphi** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:05 pm

(I was the one who noticed it... assuming that this is the full text of the charter)

Bill3000 · Post by **Bill3000** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:51 pm

Woops.

My bad. It's in the decreebook. But the Procedures of the Landsraad objection still stands - it references the Charter, not the Decrebook, so the issue for the Kaiser interfering with the internal workings of the Landsraad is still not as strong.

The decreebook is the most editable document, after all.

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:02 am

Bill, the charter forbids the Kaiser from.. oh fuck it....

osmose1000 · Post by **osmose1000** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:41 am

Erik, by your logic, all decrees within the decreebook regarding the Lansraad are all null, since they affect the rules of the Landsraad. By that logic, there isn't even supposed to be a Praetor.

However, by holding up the fact that any Kaiser can reverse any past decrees as they wish, we can perserve the praetor and continue on.

UEC · Post by **UEC** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:02 pm

People are starting to catch on.. it ONLY TOOOK A FUCKING YEAR!!!!!

osmose1000 · Post by **osmose1000** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:59 am

Shireroth

Imperial Decree #213: Praetor

Imperial Decree #213: Praetor

Who is online