The Scott analysis thread

The off-topic. Almost anything goes.
Post Reply
User avatar
phineas elastopon
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:42 am

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by phineas elastopon »

Erik Mortis wrote:More an observation...

When he sees an "underdog" he backs them. I recall two events. Tonia.. and Locke. Despite LOTS of people being mad at her and for good and various reasons (I stayed out of it), he kept supporting her in ways I've forgotten, but it was mostly at the Convention in... 04. I recall she stormed out and he followed and kept including her when other excluded her on purpose. Then.. there's locke. He made Locke a duke.. and all sorts of other stuff, BECAUSE no one liked him.. which put Locke into a place of power and influence. (and the rest is history,, but we lost some people due to those times... they told me so)...

I don't mean underdog like Jess or Hubert... but... something about the person has put them in a disadvantage, and not because they are idiots...
Hmm. Reminded me http://shireroth.org/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 0&start=16
Scott of Hyperborea wrote:Having seen the chat involved, it looked to me like CJ was more doing the general Internet thing of assenting to any mildly controversial statements in order to cause trouble than actually being racist, and that the trouble was more that a whole bunch of people dogpiled on him and called him awful names for being autistic, then decided to hate him when he complained.
Phineas Elastopon (formerly known as Benkern, Bacchus etc.)
Republic of Antica
Inquisitor
User avatar
Harvey Steffke
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Harvey Steffke »

This thread had so much potential. :(
Hesam Jayatar
Posts: 851
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:52 am

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Hesam Jayatar »

no it didn't
User avatar
Aster
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:28 pm
Location: Durham UK
Contact:

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Aster »

Hardly going to help the 'old man of Micras'. Internal dissent lol!

...In any case, onto more serious matters.

I do like Scott - to be fair, I don't really know the guy, but from what I've seen he's relatively personable. I would, however, maintain that he can more often than not come off as incredibly pretentious and, perhaps more noticably, holier-than-thou.
Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Gman Russell
Posts: 3947
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2001 3:31 pm
Location: Russell Castle, Mirioth

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Gman Russell »

How about we make a new rule for exactly this type of thread.

Anyone who posts in judgement of Scott, must then be subject to an immediate "X analysis thread" himself.
What follows has lead me to this place where I belong, with all erased.
User avatar
Yvain Wintersong
Posts: 352
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:17 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Yvain Wintersong »

I guess I have a couple of gripes with Scott.

He's always dreaming up grand new ideas, but never follows through with ninety percent of them. Sometimes it's legitimate time constraints, sometimes it's that he grows bored of them, and other times it's that he's too afraid to do anything about them unless he thinks everyone else will agree.

In fact, he's not happy UNLESS he's got some grand plan to change everything going on. Seems to me like he's bored of Shireroth, and instead of going away like Nick or Bill or any sane person would, he's desperately trying to make it interesting again by fiddling with a thousand little parameters and seeing if any of them stick. But since no one else likes the same things he does, he's not being very successful.

I expect that as the excitement of the new House system dies down and it becomes clear that things will be more or less like they were the past three years, he'll retreat further and further into boredom and bitterness until he ends up doing nothing but complaining and annoying the heck out of everyone else.
User avatar
Andreas the Wise
Posts: 5253
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:41 pm
Location: The Island of Melangia, Atterock, Kildare
Contact:

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Andreas the Wise »

Yvain Wintersong wrote:He's always dreaming up grand new ideas, but never follows through with ninety percent of them. Sometimes it's legitimate time constraints, sometimes it's that he grows bored of them, and other times it's that he's too afraid to do anything about them unless he thinks everyone else will agree.
The similarity to myself is worrying. But the wonderful thing about organising two massive story culminations (Fated War and Al'Magroth) that largely flopped is that I now feel perfectly free to do what interests me and not worry about having to involve others or expecting them to like it. :thumbsup
The character Andreas the Wise is on indefinite leave.
However, this account still manages:
Cla'Udi - Count of Melangia
Manuel - CEO of VBNC. For all you'll ever need.
Vincent Waldgrave - Lord General of Gralus
Q - Director of SAMIN
Duke Mel'Kat - Air Pirate, Melangian, and Duke of the Flying Duchy of Glanurchy

And references may be made to Vur'Alm Xei'Bôn (a Nelagan Micron of undisclosed purpose).
User avatar
Chrimigules
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:28 pm
Location: Ano, Kaikias, Antica
Contact:

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Chrimigules »

Yvain Wintersong wrote:I guess I have a couple of gripes with Scott.
You don't count!
Image
User avatar
Kaiser Mors VI
Posts: 840
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:40 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Kaiser Mors VI »

Considering that you ARE Scott.
Kaiser Mors VI,
Head of House Mortis.
User avatar
Maksym Hadjimehmetov
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:15 am

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Maksym Hadjimehmetov »

Well, the chap's a tad too competitive for my liking and needs to stop taking everything so seriously, but other than that he seems like a decent guy to me. I realise people get on eachother's nerves, especially if you've known eachother for as long as some of the Shirereithans have, but this doesn't seem the right way to go about changing things.
Image
User avatar
Ari Rahikkala
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Ari Rahikkala »

Right, well, as Harvey said, this thread didn't really fulfill its potential, but since Scott posted this I figured it was time to reveal the actual purpose of this thread anyway: To get to say that you are all silly tits!

Seriously. I don't know what kind of a weird anti-charisma field he projects, but it *is* true that Scott can't say a damn thing without people complaining about how terrible he is at being a human being anymore. My plan was basically to just wait until there was a pile of people complaining about Scott and then just go through everything and show how unfair they're being, but oh, no, you actually word it as vilification and suddenly everyone's all "well basically he's a good guy". And then they go on complaining about Scott everywhere else. But, hey, let's play with what we have anyway:
Ari: I can reference an instance when Scott has held a grudge. He continually refers to Babkha as the "Duchy of Babkha" since he's pissed off that I once annexed Shireroth to it.
Yeah. And I get to do the same thing without anyone giving a shit. I'm pretty sure everyone except Scott does.
What about that time when Bill rigged the Audente votes? It took him a long time to get over that.
Maybe, it's quite distant and I don't remember it that well. Not very up-to-date information about his character anyway.
Or that one time I did... something... and he held a grudge on me for years about it.
You're right, you *have* got the not helping department pretty much all manned by yourself, sir.
LENG
I thought grudges were against people. What makes being consistent about trying to improve the MCS map a grudge? What, has he been stalking Ryan by PM or something?
When he sees an "underdog" he backs them
And it's a good thing you called it an observation rather than a character flaw, otherwise probably... eh, at least a few hundred thousand hours of western TV and other culture with a message about the morality of backing the underdog would have to be redacted.


(Incidentally, I'm pretty surprised that Ardy was the only one who expressed he could see the purpose of this thread. Maybe others could, but they didn't say anything about it. Does everyone hate Scott so much they can't even entertain the idea someone might want to try to defend him?)
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
User avatar
Harvey Steffke
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Harvey Steffke »

Uh. So you ask for historic examples of when Scott held grudes, and I dig a little bit into my own rambling memory but can't really remember them very well, and then you criticize me for not remembering them very well. Never mind the fact that I was trying to help answer your question. Sure they were old, but you wanted examples so I found some. I don't see how this helps prove anything... other than "don't try to answer Ari's questions because there's a good chance it's being used against you vaguely somehow" maybe.
User avatar
Ari Rahikkala
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2001 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Ari Rahikkala »

Right, I take that line back then. This thread isn't supposed to be about specifically judging anyone but Scott anyway. Read it as "I tried but couldn't find a person who could actually mention a specific thing that Scott is actually holding a grudge about and not just making jokes about or something".
No-one should be without a parasol, Sirocco.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Jacobus Loki »

Scott is one of the reasons I started hanging around Shireroth.

I think sticking up for the unpopular underdog is a strength. I admire him for it.

He's smart, clever and creative.

When he gets miffed, there is a reason for it. I don't see him getting upset more often than anyone ELSE around here. When he does, he's just better at explaining why than most of us.

From the days of the Parliament of Audentior until today, it has been a pleasure to know him and to have worked with him on occasion.

I can't ever remember being P.O.ed at him.
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
User avatar
Kaiser Ometeotl I
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:32 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Kaiser Ometeotl I »

I have lots of examples of being mad at him. Most of them 'cause we hold different views on things, so I let most of it go after a few weeks, at the most. The underdog thing gets annoying with people like.. Locke. I still see that as a huge mistake that seriously harmed this nation. On the other hand CJ, despite the controversy, has proven an active and dedicated citizen.

I think we have a habit, us old timers, of condensing 10 years of interaction into just the bad stuff, and focusing on that. We see the behaviors of others, focus on when they didn't suit us, and call them flaws. With me, people focus on my stubbornness, but how many times was I also willing to bend or even toss out old things for new things. Do we recall CRY, or all the weirdness I did in Tymaria. No, I just get remembered for the Flag, Amity(current) and a number of other things.

Scott just gets remembered for a few grudges, which aren't that many that I know of. I think the conflict between him and harvey is one of the only long standing dispute. Or the occassional flare up between me and him.
User avatar
Jacobus Loki
Posts: 4205
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:00 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Jacobus Loki »

CJ, despite the controversy, has proven an active and dedicated citizen.
Hey, Scott doesn't get all the credit for that. CJ's citizenship was part of the price Anandja II paid to make Loki IV go away. :evil :tomcutterhamonfire


BTW Who was Tom Cutterham, and why would he catch fire?

Something about Hanover and a Coat of Arms......
Jacobus Loki
Shireroth sumus. Tempus in parte nostrum est.
Lord of Hallucination, Protector of Illumination, MiniEx of Shireroth, Traditional King of the Mala'anje.
User avatar
Kaiser Ometeotl I
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:32 pm

Re: The Scott analysis thread

Post by Kaiser Ometeotl I »

Beats me. I got no clue.
Post Reply

Return to “Shrine of Controversy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest